Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Evidence

Cleveland State Law Review

1963

Expert testimony

Articles 1 - 1 of 1

Full-Text Articles in Law

Subjective Complaints V. Objective Signs, David I. Sindell, Irwin N. Perr Jan 1963

Subjective Complaints V. Objective Signs, David I. Sindell, Irwin N. Perr

Cleveland State Law Review

The word "versus" in the title presents what we think is one of the most important problems of plaintiff trial lawyers today. After years of preparation, we submit our case to a jury; our medical witnesses offer testimony based on long time observation, treatment and evaluation. Then, in walks the defendant's doctor and proceeds to plunge a dagger into our case by calling our client either a malingerer or a neurotic, or just a plain liar. He testifies that he saw none of the objective signs that our medical examiners found, and concludes that all of the subjective complaints are …