Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Admissibility (1)
- Appeal (1)
- Civil procedure (1)
- Daubert (1)
- Daubert Analysis (1)
-
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Phamaceuticals Inc (1)
- District court (1)
- Evidentiary rules (1)
- Expert testimony. Expert witness (1)
- Eyewitness identification (1)
- Gatekeeping errors (1)
- Harmful error (1)
- Judicial interpretations (1)
- Law enforcement (1)
- Legislation (1)
- Legislative directive (1)
- Manson v. Brathwaite (1)
- Misidentification (1)
- Reform (1)
- Reliability (1)
- Remand (1)
- Reversal (1)
- Scientific developments (1)
- Unreliable (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Law
Is Limited Remand Required If The District Court Admitted Or Excluded Evidence Without A Daubert Analysis?, Robert B. Gilbreath
Is Limited Remand Required If The District Court Admitted Or Excluded Evidence Without A Daubert Analysis?, Robert B. Gilbreath
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
The Promises And Pitfalls Of State Eyewitness Identification Reforms, Nicholas A. Kahn-Fogel
The Promises And Pitfalls Of State Eyewitness Identification Reforms, Nicholas A. Kahn-Fogel
Faculty Scholarship
This article provides a comprehensive analysis of state-based eyewitness identification reforms, including legislative directives, evidentiary rules, and judicial interpretations of state constitutions as providing greater protection against the use of unreliable eyewitness evidence than the United State Supreme Court offered in its 1977 decision in Manson v. Brathwaite. While previous scholarship has included thorough consideration of a single state's eyewitness law, state-by-state analysis of a sub-issue in eyewitness law, and brief general surveys of state approaches to eyewitness reform, this article adds to the current body of scholarship with an in-depth evaluation of eyewitness identification law in states that have …