Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Evidence (2)
- Hypnosis (2)
- Memory (2)
- 2001 (1)
- 9 11 (1)
-
- 9 – 11 (1)
- 9/11 (1)
- AUMF (1)
- Admissibility of hypnotically enhanced testimony into evidence (1)
- Afghanistan (1)
- Al Quada (1)
- Al-Qaeda (1)
- Alien (1)
- Aliens (1)
- America (1)
- American (1)
- American military tribunal (1)
- Article 36 (1)
- Article thirty-six (1)
- Attack (1)
- Authorization for use of military force (1)
- Boumediene (1)
- Boumediene v. Bush (1)
- Bush (1)
- CSRT proceeding (1)
- Canudo (1)
- Combatant (1)
- Combatant Status Review Tribunals (1)
- Confabulation (1)
- Criminal trial (1)
- File Type
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Law
Canudo On Evidence: Laws Of New York, Gary Shaw
Trances, Trials, And Tribulations; Symposium Comparing New York And Federal Evidence Law, Gary Shaw
Trances, Trials, And Tribulations; Symposium Comparing New York And Federal Evidence Law, Gary Shaw
Gary M. Shaw
A transcript of the author’s remarks at a 1994 symposium comparing New York and Federal Laws regarding hypnosis and witness testimony.
The Admissibility Of Hypnotically Enhanced Testimony In Criminal Trials, Gary Shaw
The Admissibility Of Hypnotically Enhanced Testimony In Criminal Trials, Gary Shaw
Gary M. Shaw
No abstract provided.
Due Process In American Military Tribunals After September 11, 2001, Gary Shaw
Due Process In American Military Tribunals After September 11, 2001, Gary Shaw
Gary M. Shaw
The Authorization for Use of Military Force ("AUMF") provides broad powers for a president after September 11, 2001. President Bush, under the AUMF, claimed he had the power to hold "enemy combatants" without due process. This gave rise to two questions that the article addresses: "Could they be held indefinitely without charges or proceedings being initiated? If proceedings had to be initiated, what process was due to the defendants?"