Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Evidence (17)
- Administrative law (5)
- Admissibility of evidence (4)
- Discovery (4)
- California (3)
-
- Criminal procedure (3)
- Administrative law judges (2)
- Admissibility (2)
- Admissible evidence (2)
- Automobile (2)
- Confidentiality (2)
- Constitutional law (2)
- Criminal intent (2)
- Cross-examination (2)
- Due process of law (2)
- Eavesdropping (2)
- Exclusionary rule (2)
- Federal courts (2)
- Fifth Amendment (2)
- Fourth Amendment (2)
- Hearsay (2)
- Impeachment of witnesses (2)
- Insanity defense (2)
- Judicial review (2)
- Litigation (2)
- Mediation (2)
- Mens rea (2)
- Mental illness (2)
- Self-incrimination (2)
- Testimony (2)
Articles 1 - 30 of 40
Full-Text Articles in Law
People V. Rojas: The Expanding Concept Of Unavailability, Brian Wade Uhl
People V. Rojas: The Expanding Concept Of Unavailability, Brian Wade Uhl
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Duty Of The Prosecutor To Disclose Unrequested Evidence: United States V. Agurs, Christian F. Dubia Jr
The Duty Of The Prosecutor To Disclose Unrequested Evidence: United States V. Agurs, Christian F. Dubia Jr
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Discovery By The Prosecution In Criminal Cases: Prudhomme Reconsidered , Jon R. Rolefson
Discovery By The Prosecution In Criminal Cases: Prudhomme Reconsidered , Jon R. Rolefson
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Weatherford V. Bursey: "Surreptitious Invasion… Into The Legal Camp Of The Defense", Paul H. Voss
Weatherford V. Bursey: "Surreptitious Invasion… Into The Legal Camp Of The Defense", Paul H. Voss
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Limiting The Use Of Prior Felony Convictions To Impeach A Defendant - Witness In California Criminal Proceedings, Richard E. Boehm
Limiting The Use Of Prior Felony Convictions To Impeach A Defendant - Witness In California Criminal Proceedings, Richard E. Boehm
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Punitive Damages: An Exception To The Right Of Privacy? Coy V. Superior Court, Richard S. Fields
Punitive Damages: An Exception To The Right Of Privacy? Coy V. Superior Court, Richard S. Fields
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Research Project, David J. Agatstein
Research Project, David J. Agatstein
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
No abstract provided.
Evidence For Administrative Law Judges, Christine Mckenna Moore
Evidence For Administrative Law Judges, Christine Mckenna Moore
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
No abstract provided.
Argument And Courtroom Theatrics, Larry Geller, Peter Hemenway
Argument And Courtroom Theatrics, Larry Geller, Peter Hemenway
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
No abstract provided.
Vocational Testimony In Social Security Hearings, Daniel F. Solomon
Vocational Testimony In Social Security Hearings, Daniel F. Solomon
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
No abstract provided.
Developments In The Law Of Scientific Evidence: The Admissibility Of Polygraph Evidence, Sheila K. Hyatt
Developments In The Law Of Scientific Evidence: The Admissibility Of Polygraph Evidence, Sheila K. Hyatt
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
No abstract provided.
Polygraph Examinations In Administrative Proceedings: Mcgowan V. City Of Bloomington, David J. Agatstein
Polygraph Examinations In Administrative Proceedings: Mcgowan V. City Of Bloomington, David J. Agatstein
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
No abstract provided.
Unrebutted Evidence, E. J. Watts, David J. Agatstein
Unrebutted Evidence, E. J. Watts, David J. Agatstein
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
No abstract provided.
Workers Compensation: Presenting Medical Evidence In Heart Cases, Gerald J. Haas, Lowell A. Reed Jr, Irvin Stander
Workers Compensation: Presenting Medical Evidence In Heart Cases, Gerald J. Haas, Lowell A. Reed Jr, Irvin Stander
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
No abstract provided.
Evidence Column, Paul Troeh Jr.
Evidence Column, Paul Troeh Jr.
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
No abstract provided.
Two Notes On Evidence: Privileges And Hearsay, J. W. Deese
Two Notes On Evidence: Privileges And Hearsay, J. W. Deese
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
No abstract provided.
Impeachment In Administrative Cases, Calvin William Sharpe
Impeachment In Administrative Cases, Calvin William Sharpe
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
No abstract provided.
Relevancy Of Evidence In Administrative Law Proceedings, J. W. Deese
Relevancy Of Evidence In Administrative Law Proceedings, J. W. Deese
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
No abstract provided.
Judges In The Executive Branch And Judges In The Judicial Branch: Similar, Yet Distinct, Thomas G. Welshko
Judges In The Executive Branch And Judges In The Judicial Branch: Similar, Yet Distinct, Thomas G. Welshko
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
No abstract provided.
The Right To Cross-Examine Physicians In Social Security Disability Cases, Victor G. Rosenblum
The Right To Cross-Examine Physicians In Social Security Disability Cases, Victor G. Rosenblum
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
This Article examines the alternative readings and rationales of Richardson v. Perales regarding the cross-examination of reporting physicians in social security disability claim hearings. First, Part II compares the Sixth and Second Circuit's interpretation of the Perales rule, which supports the SSA's regulation and interpretation, to the Fifth Circuit's interpretation, which explicitly proclaims cross-examination, once duly requested, to be an absolute right. Part III questions whether the Perales Court's declaration that the SSA is “an [impartial] adjudicator and not . . . an advocate or adversary” remains empirically valid. Part IV discusses the SSA's recent assertions of management prerogatives that …
When Dicta Attacks: Elliott V. Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Joanna E. Barnes
When Dicta Attacks: Elliott V. Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Joanna E. Barnes
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
No abstract provided.
The Impact Of Adverse Inferences In Administrative Hearings, John M. Priester
The Impact Of Adverse Inferences In Administrative Hearings, John M. Priester
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
No abstract provided.
The Role Of Demeanor Evidence In Determining Credibility Of Witnesses In Fact Finding: The Views Of Aljs, Gregory L. Ogden
The Role Of Demeanor Evidence In Determining Credibility Of Witnesses In Fact Finding: The Views Of Aljs, Gregory L. Ogden
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
Prof. Ogden presents the views of administrative law judge’s on the role of demeanor evidence in determining the credibility of witnesses’ testimony in fact finding. The opinions of administrative law judges add an important new perspective on the issue of whether demeanor evidence increases the accuracy of credibility determinations. The views of administrative law judges were determined through the techniques of survey research, utilizing a questionnaire. After defining demeanor evidence for purposes of the study, Ogden explains the administrative law principle of judicial review that gives weight or deference to credibility determinations based on demeanor evidence. A statistical analysis of …
There But For The Grace Of God Go I: The Right Of Cross-Examination In Social Security Disability Hearings , Bradley S. Dixon
There But For The Grace Of God Go I: The Right Of Cross-Examination In Social Security Disability Hearings , Bradley S. Dixon
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
No abstract provided.
Drug Use And The Exclusionary Manque, Jerome A. Busch
Drug Use And The Exclusionary Manque, Jerome A. Busch
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
United States V. Salvucci: The Problematic Absence Of Automatic Standing, William C. Bollard
United States V. Salvucci: The Problematic Absence Of Automatic Standing, William C. Bollard
Pepperdine Law Review
The United States Supreme Court recently abolished the automatic standing rule in United States v. Salvucci. The author analyzes the difficulties created for the criminal defendant charged with a possessory crime. In particular, this note focuses on the inequitable position the defendant is placed in when his suppression hearing testimony is used as a tool to impeach subsequent testimony offered at trial. The author continues by pointing out that the "prosecutorial self-contradiction," sought to be abolished in Salvucci, remains a part of our present judicial system. In conclusion, the author offers several considerations that will necessarily be an integral part …
New York V. Belton: The Scope Of Warrantless Searches Extended, Glenn D. Forcucci
New York V. Belton: The Scope Of Warrantless Searches Extended, Glenn D. Forcucci
Pepperdine Law Review
The United States Supreme Court, in New York v. Belton, expanded the area in which a policeman may search after he has made a lawful custodial arrest. In so ruling, the Supreme Court dramatically departed from its previous holding in Chimel v. California. While Chimel limited the area of the search to the area "within the immediate control of the arrestee," Belton allowed a search outside of that established boundary, as the Supreme Court allowed the search to include the passenger compartment of an automobile which the arrestee had not occupied.
Admissibility Of Illegally Seized Evidence In Civil Cases: Could This Be The Path Out Of The Labyrinth Of The Exclusionary Rule?, Richard J. Hanscom
Admissibility Of Illegally Seized Evidence In Civil Cases: Could This Be The Path Out Of The Labyrinth Of The Exclusionary Rule?, Richard J. Hanscom
Pepperdine Law Review
The use of the exclusionary rule in criminal cases has been the subject of extensive debate since its inception. Although most efforts to modify the rule have been deemed unworkable, the author proposes a modification that is both workable and sensible. Modification would be accomplished by legislation which admits the results of illegal searches by law enforcement officers who acted in good faith, and, at the same time, provide fixed monetary sanctions against the governmental agencies whose officers conducted the search. The author proposes a good faith balancing test to determine evidence admissibility and administrative type proceedings to determine monetary …
The Use Of Aviation Accident Reports By Civil Litigants: The Historical Development Of 49 U.S.C. Section 1441(E), Walter A. T. Welch Jr., John E. Faulk
The Use Of Aviation Accident Reports By Civil Litigants: The Historical Development Of 49 U.S.C. Section 1441(E), Walter A. T. Welch Jr., John E. Faulk
Pepperdine Law Review
When aviation accidents occur, the National Transportation Safety Board conducts an investigation to determine the conditions, circumstances, and ultimately the probable cause of the accident. There is a federal statutory privilege which renders these reports, as well as testimony from the attending investigator, inadmissible as evidence in any suit or action arising from the accident. However, certain judicially created exceptions have arisen which permit portions of the report and certain investigator testimony to be admitted into evidence. The authors delineate and analyze these exceptions as they discuss the trend toward increased report and testimony admissibility. The authors conclude with a …
Understanding Admissibility Of Prior Bad Acts: A Diagrammatic Approach, William Roth
Understanding Admissibility Of Prior Bad Acts: A Diagrammatic Approach, William Roth
Pepperdine Law Review
One of the most misunderstood areas of evidence in criminal cases is the admissibility of a defendant's prior bad acts. This article discusses both the practical and theoretical perspectives of prior bad acts and presents a diagram of the different admissibility theories. This visual aid is a great step forward in simplifying this problematic area.