Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Adjudication (1)
- Anti-Circumvention (1)
- Anti-Dumping Regulation (1)
- Article 113 of the EEC Treaty (1)
- Comparative Law (1)
-
- Constitution (1)
- Constitutional Law (1)
- Determination of Dumping and Injury (1)
- European Community (1)
- Foreign Judgments (1)
- Foreign Trade (1)
- Free Market Economy (1)
- French Legal System (1)
- Full Faith and Credit Clause (1)
- GATT (1)
- Jurisdiction (1)
- Markets (1)
- Non-Money Judgments (1)
- Tokyo Round (1)
- Transnational Law (1)
- URAA (1)
- Uruguay Round (1)
- WTO (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Law
Major Changes In Council Regulation 3283/94: Its Compatibility With The Uruguay Round Anti-Dumping Code, Sangsoo Son
Major Changes In Council Regulation 3283/94: Its Compatibility With The Uruguay Round Anti-Dumping Code, Sangsoo Son
LLM Theses and Essays
Dumping can be defined as exporting goods at prices below those charged on the domestic market or at prices insufficient to recover the cost of the goods sold. Dumping is considered an unfair trading practice because it interferes with free market economy principles. During the 1980s, anti-dumping measures were an important issue for a few developed countries that had attractive markets for foreign producers; these countries were the United States, the European Community, Canada, and Australia. The European Community (EC) has developed its own anti-dumping laws over the years; Article 113 of the EEC Treaty gives power to Community institutions …
The Recognition And Enforcement Of Foreign Equitable Remedies And Other Types Of Non-Money Judgments In United States And French Courts: A Comparative Analysis, Noele Sophie Rigot
The Recognition And Enforcement Of Foreign Equitable Remedies And Other Types Of Non-Money Judgments In United States And French Courts: A Comparative Analysis, Noele Sophie Rigot
LLM Theses and Essays
Courts of industrialized nations are often faced with adjudication of cases which involve foreign components. It is common for those courts to be asked by individuals or legal entities from a transnational environment to adjudicate with regard to some elements already adjudged in a different legal system as if it were a local judgment. The question that arises is how effects should be given when dealing with prior adjudications. Most countries agree to recognize some effects determined by foreign jurisdictions, as long as those determinations meet standards that guarantee proper integration of the foreign decision into the domestic setting. These …