Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Articles 1 - 6 of 6

Full-Text Articles in Law

Crummey Trusts: An Exploitation Of The Annual Exclusion, Dora Arash Nov 2012

Crummey Trusts: An Exploitation Of The Annual Exclusion, Dora Arash

Pepperdine Law Review

No abstract provided.


Kentucky's Doctrine Of Advancements: A Time For Reform, Carolyn S. Bratt Jan 1987

Kentucky's Doctrine Of Advancements: A Time For Reform, Carolyn S. Bratt

Law Faculty Scholarly Articles

The act of giving a gift is accomplished so easily that the legal consequences often escape the donor. Even when a donor stops to contemplate the legal significance of her or his act, a parental donor probably is unaware that a gift to a child may affect the child's inheritance rights in the parent's estate. Kentucky is among the minority of states which continue to presume that a parental gift is intended as an advancement to the child donee. Moreover, Kentucky is one of only two states which make the presumption irrebutable. The value of the gift is charged against …


Future Interests-Powers Of Disposition-Some Practical Considerations In Using Powers Of Disposition For Testamentary Purpose, Lawrence Ray Bishop S.Ed. May 1963

Future Interests-Powers Of Disposition-Some Practical Considerations In Using Powers Of Disposition For Testamentary Purpose, Lawrence Ray Bishop S.Ed.

Michigan Law Review

Testators, in an effort to retain control of their property from beyond the grave, have often developed schemes by which they attempt to alter the normal devolution of title to, and the utilization of, that property by their beneficiaries. One of the primary motives giving rise to such schemes is the desire to give the immediate object of a testator's bounty a great deal of flexibility and control in the use of the testamentary property, while reserving to the testator the possibility of controlling its further disposition upon the death of such person. The most theoretically suitable device by which …


Property - Powers - State Powers Statutes Protecting Creditors And Requiring Formal Execution, Robert A. Smith S. Ed. Mar 1960

Property - Powers - State Powers Statutes Protecting Creditors And Requiring Formal Execution, Robert A. Smith S. Ed.

Michigan Law Review

The first part of the comment considers the elevation sections of the statute-sections that change the donee's interest in the appointive or dispositive property to a fee for the benefit of creditors. The second part considers the execution sections of the statute-sections that subject the execution of powers to conveyancing requirements. These sections are of the utmost significance to estate planners.


Power Of Appointment-Validity Of Exercise Subject To A No-Contest Clause, John J. Gaskell Jan 1950

Power Of Appointment-Validity Of Exercise Subject To A No-Contest Clause, John J. Gaskell

Michigan Law Review

The decedent received under the will of her husband a general testamentary power of appointment over a remainder interest. In her will she exercised the power, providing that any person benefiting under the power who in any manner should institute, encourage, or participate in proceedings for the avoidance of any part of the will should forfeit his right to any benefits from the power or from her estate. Held, exercise of a general testamentary power of appointment subject to a no-contest forfeiture provision is valid. Marx v. Rice, 1 N.J. 584, 65 A. (2d) 48 (1949).


Powers-General Testamentary Power:-Ineffective Appointment- Devolution Of Appointive Property, Richard L. Eckhart S.Ed. Nov 1948

Powers-General Testamentary Power:-Ineffective Appointment- Devolution Of Appointive Property, Richard L. Eckhart S.Ed.

Michigan Law Review

In the usual case, the question of the devolution of property subject to a general testamentary power where the appointment is ineffective arises in a contest between those representing the estate of the donee on the one hand and those representing the estate of the donor, including the takers in default, on the other. The historical concept that the devolution of appointive property is from the donor to the appointee competes with the modern concept that the donee's interest in the property is, for many purposes, close to absolute ownership.