Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Environmental law (2)
- Administrative law (1)
- Citizen suits (1)
- Coal (1)
- Combustion (1)
-
- Environment (1)
- Environmental (1)
- Environmental citizen suits (1)
- Environmental compliance (1)
- Environmental justice (1)
- Environmental policy act (1)
- Executive branch (1)
- Friends of the Earth (1)
- Injury (1)
- Laidlaw (1)
- Redressability (1)
- Regulations (1)
- SCOTUS (1)
- Standing (1)
- Supreme Court (1)
- Supreme Court of the United States (1)
- Wetlands regulation (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
Standing In Environmental Citizen Suits: Laidlaw’S Clarification Of The Injury-In-Fact And Redressability Requirements, Michael P. Healy
Standing In Environmental Citizen Suits: Laidlaw’S Clarification Of The Injury-In-Fact And Redressability Requirements, Michael P. Healy
Law Faculty Scholarly Articles
In its first week of business during the new millennium, the U.S. Supreme Court decided Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc., and provided important clarifications about the law of standing in environmental citizen suits. Specifically, the Court rejected the narrow view of environmental injury-in-fact advocated by Justice Scalia and instead adhered to the broader view of injury-in-fact established in a nonenvironmental context by the Court's decision in Federal Elections Commission v. Akins. As importantly, the Court also addressed the redressability requirement of Article III standing in Laidlaw. Here too, the Court did …
16th Annual Environmental Law Institute, Office Of Continuing Legal Education At The University Of Kentucky College Of Law, Christopher R. Fitzpatrick, Carl W. Breeding, Timothy J. Hagerty, Marc S. Murphy, Wanda Ballard Repasky, Clinton J. Elliott, Thomas W. Fitzgerald, Dennis J. Conniff, Laura D. Keller, W. Blaine Early, Eric A. Braun, Michael P. Healy, Glenna Jo Curry, James L. Dickinson, W. Patrick Stallard, Richard H. Underwood
16th Annual Environmental Law Institute, Office Of Continuing Legal Education At The University Of Kentucky College Of Law, Christopher R. Fitzpatrick, Carl W. Breeding, Timothy J. Hagerty, Marc S. Murphy, Wanda Ballard Repasky, Clinton J. Elliott, Thomas W. Fitzgerald, Dennis J. Conniff, Laura D. Keller, W. Blaine Early, Eric A. Braun, Michael P. Healy, Glenna Jo Curry, James L. Dickinson, W. Patrick Stallard, Richard H. Underwood
Continuing Legal Education Materials
Materials from the 16th Annual Environmental Law Institute held by UK/CLE in May 2000.
Overview Of Environmental Regulations That Affect Coal Combustion, Cortland F. Eble
Overview Of Environmental Regulations That Affect Coal Combustion, Cortland F. Eble
Information Circular--KGS
Environmental regulations have had, and continue to have, an effect on the combustion of coal. These regulations largely affect the electric utility industry, the largest consumer of domestic coal, but they ultimately affect everyone, because we all use electricity, and the cost of compliance is usually passed on to the consumer, resulting in higher electric bills.