Law Commons^™

Relationship Of Federal Common Law And Federal Regulatory Statutes, City Of Milwaukee V. Illinois And Michigan, David E. Morris

Akron Law Review

In City of Milwaukee v. Illinois and Michigan, the United States Supreme Court vacated the judgment of the court of appeals and remanded the case, holding that the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972 had indeed displaced the federal common law action authorized by the Court before the 1972 Amendments were enacted. The environmental law ramifications of this decision are significant. However, of greater significance is the Court's attempt in Milwaukee to efface some of the uncertainty surrounding the federal common law, and to elucidate the relationship between federal regulatory statutes and federal common law.

Municipal Solid Waste Management: The States Must Pick Up Where Congress Left Off, Julie Jones Thompson

Akron Law Review

This comment examines solid waste management strategies which present alternatives to landfilling. The EPA has encouraged the incineration of solid wastes. However, incineration may pose more environmental problems than it resolves. The EPA has not encouraged recycling programs which could achieve more environmentally protective results.

This comment also discusses the state's responsibility for solid waste management. Currently, municipalities bear the brunt of this problem. However, the municipalities' plans have resulted in inadequate and isolated solid waste management pockets throughout the country. Fortunately, the states are beginning to respond to this problem.

Pennsylvania V. Union Gas Company: The Supreme Court Employs The Wrong Means To Reach The Proper End, Christopher A. Brodman

Akron Law Review

This casenote reviews the facts of Union Gas, the history of eleventh amendment jurisprudence, and the purposes of CERCLA. The note critically analyzes the Supreme Court's approach to evading eleventh amendment immunity. Finally, the note contemplates the impact of Union Gas on CERCLA and eleventh amendment law.

City Of Chicago V. Environmental Defense Fund, Inc." Making The Case For Broader Application Of Chevron, U.S.A. V. Natural Resource Defense Council, Frank Lasalle

Akron Law Review

The purpose of this Note is to examine the Supreme Court's reasoning in City of Chicago v. Environmental Defense Fund, and to explore the implications of the Court's decision. First, Section II of this Note delineates the relevant statutory and regulatory background concerning the regulation of municipal solid waste. Next, Section III presents the statement of the case. Finally, Section IV analyzes the Supreme Court's decision. Section IV(A) criticizes the Court's limited focus in interpreting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976 (RCRA). Section IV(B) contends that the Court's interpretation of RCRA is incorrect because it violates one of …

The Fox Is Guarding The Henhouse: Enhancing The Role Of The Epa In Fonsi Determinations Pursuant To Nepa, Wendy B. Davis

Akron Law Review

This article suggests an enhanced role for the EPA and the other agencies that have authority to protect our natural resources, including the FWS, NPS, and others. These agencies should have authority to evaluate the environmental assessments leading to a FONSI and require preparation of an EIS pursuant to NEPA. This paper also suggests that these agencies need more authority in the substantive decision of choice of an alternative action pursuant to the EIS, and the determination of whether the proposed action should proceed based on the conclusions in the EIS. This could be accomplished with an amendment to the …

Power To The People: Restoring The Public Voice In Environmental Law, Albert C. Lin

Akron Law Review

Although the last forty years of environmental law have witnessed some successes, they have also increasingly revealed the limitations of existing laws and regulatory structures. Congress has been unable to pass substantial environmental legislation in recent years, notwithstanding widespread recognition of the need for better tools for responding to climate change, toxic chemicals, non-point source water pollution, and other problems. In addition, the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) has struggled in the wake of limited resources and politicization to effectively use the tools it has, and its rulemaking processes are often dominated by industry and other repeat players. To deal with …