Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Education (6)
- Affirmative action programs in education (5)
- First Amendment (5)
- College admission (3)
- Constitution (3)
-
- Discrimination (3)
- Equal rights (3)
- Establishment Clause (3)
- Law school admission (3)
- Minority law students (3)
- Public School (3)
- Religion (3)
- School (3)
- Admission (2)
- Colleges (2)
- Congress (2)
- Constitutional law (2)
- Endorse (2)
- Equal protection (2)
- Establishment clause (2)
- Free speech (2)
- Gender (2)
- Race discrimination (2)
- Race preferences (2)
- Racial discrimination (2)
- Religious (2)
- Remedies (2)
- Sex Discrimination (2)
- Spending Power (2)
- Strict scrutiny doctrine (2)
Articles 1 - 22 of 22
Full-Text Articles in Law
National Collegiate Athletic Association V. Tarkanian: Supreme Court Upholds Ncaa's Private Status Under The Fourteenth Amendment, Repelling Shark's Attack On Ncaa's Disciplinary Powers, Michael G. Dawson
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Government's Denigration Of Religion: Is God The Victim Of Discrimination In Our Public Schools?, Michael R. O'Neill
Government's Denigration Of Religion: Is God The Victim Of Discrimination In Our Public Schools?, Michael R. O'Neill
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Lee V. Weisman: Unanswered Prayers, Marilyn Perrin
Lee V. Weisman: Unanswered Prayers, Marilyn Perrin
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Eradicating Sex Discrimination In Education: Extending Disparate-Impact Analysis To Title Ix Litigation, James S. Wrona
Eradicating Sex Discrimination In Education: Extending Disparate-Impact Analysis To Title Ix Litigation, James S. Wrona
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
It's All Fun And Games Until Someone Loses An Eye: An Analysis Of University Liability For Actions Of Student Organizations, Jennifer L. Spaziano
It's All Fun And Games Until Someone Loses An Eye: An Analysis Of University Liability For Actions Of Student Organizations, Jennifer L. Spaziano
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Gender Classification And United States V. Virginia: Muddying The Waters Of Equal Protection , Brent L. Caslin
Gender Classification And United States V. Virginia: Muddying The Waters Of Equal Protection , Brent L. Caslin
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Playing The "Get Out Of College Free" Card: Dischargeability Of Educational Debts In Chapter 7 Bankruptcy, Julie J. Heimark
Playing The "Get Out Of College Free" Card: Dischargeability Of Educational Debts In Chapter 7 Bankruptcy, Julie J. Heimark
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Milwaukee Parental Choice Program: A Constitutional Victory For School Choice, Robert L. Mcfarland
The Milwaukee Parental Choice Program: A Constitutional Victory For School Choice, Robert L. Mcfarland
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
State Action And The Supreme Court's Emerging Consensus On The Line Between Establishment And Private Religious Expression, Michael W. Mcconnell
State Action And The Supreme Court's Emerging Consensus On The Line Between Establishment And Private Religious Expression, Michael W. Mcconnell
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Scholastic Steroids: Is Generation Rx Cognitively Cheating? , Kelline R. Linton
Scholastic Steroids: Is Generation Rx Cognitively Cheating? , Kelline R. Linton
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Disappearing Schoolhouse Gate: Applying Tinker In The Internet Age , John T. Ceglia
The Disappearing Schoolhouse Gate: Applying Tinker In The Internet Age , John T. Ceglia
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Liable For Your Lies: Misrepresentation Law As A Mechanism For Regulating Behavior On Social Networking Sites, Geelan Fahimy
Liable For Your Lies: Misrepresentation Law As A Mechanism For Regulating Behavior On Social Networking Sites, Geelan Fahimy
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Davis V. Monroe County Board Of Education: Setting A Stringent Standard Of Fault For School Liability In Peer Sexual Harassment Under Title Ix-Demanding Responsible Proactive Protection, Lindsay Havern
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Cedar Rapids Community School District V. Garret F.: A High Price For Equal Education , Kristie Harding
Cedar Rapids Community School District V. Garret F.: A High Price For Equal Education , Kristie Harding
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Mitchell V. Helms: Giving The Cleveland School Voucher Program A Fighting Chance, Tyler Neal
Mitchell V. Helms: Giving The Cleveland School Voucher Program A Fighting Chance, Tyler Neal
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
An Argument For Cadillacs Instead Of Chevrolets: How The Legal System Can Facilitate The Needs Of The Twice-Exceptional Child, Kim Millman
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Retaining Diversity In The Classroom: Strategies For Maximizing The Benefits That Flow From A Diverse Student Body, Chris Chambers Goodman
Retaining Diversity In The Classroom: Strategies For Maximizing The Benefits That Flow From A Diverse Student Body, Chris Chambers Goodman
Pepperdine Law Review
In Grutter v. Bollinger, the United States Supreme Court addressed the issue of whether diversity is a sufficiently compelling government interest to justify an affirmative action program that considered race and ethnicity in allocating law school admission offers. The Court determined that diversity was a compelling interest, resolving the conflict in the federal circuits on that issue. In this article, Goodman argues that the courts must examine the tightness of the fit between the goal of either achieving diversity or of realizing the benefits that flow from a diverse student body, and the means used to try to accomplish either …
Diversity As A Dead-End , Kenneth B. Nunn
How Strictly Scrutinized?: Examining The Educational Benefits The Court Relied Upon In Grutter, Patrick M. Garry
How Strictly Scrutinized?: Examining The Educational Benefits The Court Relied Upon In Grutter, Patrick M. Garry
Pepperdine Law Review
In Grutter v. Bollinger, the Court recognized student body diversity as a compelling state interest that justified the use of racial preferences in selecting applicants for admission to public university law schools. Normally, any state action reviewed under a strict scrutiny approach is destined for invalidation. But in Grutter, the Court bucked the trend and upheld the race-based admissions policy against a racial discrimination challenge brought under the Fourteenth Amendment's equal protection clause. Given the rarity of a state action surviving strict scrutiny review, it is instructive to examine the nature of the diversity interest recognized by the Court in …
"Making Excellence Inclusive" In Education And Beyond, Alma Clayton-Pedersen, Sonja Clayton-Pedersen
"Making Excellence Inclusive" In Education And Beyond, Alma Clayton-Pedersen, Sonja Clayton-Pedersen
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Plessy's Ghost: Grutter, Seattle And The Quiet Reversal Of Brown, D. Marvin Jones
Plessy's Ghost: Grutter, Seattle And The Quiet Reversal Of Brown, D. Marvin Jones
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Scrutinize This!: The Questionable Constitutionality Of Gender-Conscious Admissions Policies Utilized By Public Universities, Amy Hinkley
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.