Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
Re Canada Post Corp And Cupw, Innis Christie
Re Canada Post Corp And Cupw, Innis Christie
Innis Christie Collection
Union grievance filed March 7, 2002 on behalf of all affected employees alleging breach of the Collective Agreement between the parties bearing the expiry date January 31, 2003, in that the Employer violated Articles 2, 11, 13, 15, 17 and all other related provisions of the Collective Agreement by placing full-time supervisor, David Waller, into a full-time letter carrier position/assignment at the Dartmouth Delivery Centre. The Union seeks an order that the Employer remove David Waller from the full-time letter carrier position/assignment and grant full redress to all affected employees under either Article 39.01 or Article 17.04.
Re Nova Scotia Liquor Corp And Nsgeu, Local 470, Innis Christie
Re Nova Scotia Liquor Corp And Nsgeu, Local 470, Innis Christie
Innis Christie Collection
This is a consent award. The parties are agreed that the Employer breached the Agreement by not posting full-time jobs in the warehouse.
The Employer agrees to post seven (7) full-time warehouseman positions, and two (2) conditional warehouseman positions on or before December 14, 2001. The Union waives any right to claim entitlement to further warehouseman postings over the review periods spanning 1998 through 2001. The parties agree to make their best efforts to resolve issues in upcoming bargaining negotiations. Failing agreement on the meaning of the term "non-overlapping hours", either party may grieve its interpretation.
Re Canada Post Corp And Cupw (N00-00-00008), Innis Christie
Re Canada Post Corp And Cupw (N00-00-00008), Innis Christie
Innis Christie Collection
The parties have requested a declaratory judgement interpreting Article 20.10 of the Agreement, respecting deduction of sick leave credit. The Union takes the position that the Article applies to employees classified as full-time but only working part of the day due to participation in a work-hardening program or because of a disability being accommodated by the Employer. The Employer's position is that the provision is only intended to apply to absences for part of a full- time shift because of unexpected onset of illness during the shift.