Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Dispute Resolution and Arbitration

1991

Dispute resolution

Articles 1 - 3 of 3

Full-Text Articles in Law

Out With The Old, In With The New: The Mini-Trial Is The New Wave In Resolving International Disputes, Mark D. Calvert Jan 1991

Out With The Old, In With The New: The Mini-Trial Is The New Wave In Resolving International Disputes, Mark D. Calvert

Journal of Dispute Resolution

Historically, merchants used arbitration to settle commercial disputes among themselves.1 However, the early American courts viewed arbitration unfavorably, often refusing to acknowledge its validity. 2 During the 1970's, however, the courts' attitude toward arbitration shifted. The United States Supreme Court decision, The Breman v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.,3 ushered in an era of growing acceptance toward arbitration agreements. The change in the Court's attitude has allowed businesses to provide for arbitration agreements in their contracts without fearing that their desire to avoid litigation would be thwarted


Book Review , Timothy J. Heinsz Jan 1991

Book Review , Timothy J. Heinsz

Journal of Dispute Resolution

As the use of arbitration as a dispute resolution mechanism continues to increase not only in the area of labor relations but also in other fields as well, the authority of arbitrators to issue remedies has likewise become a more important topic. The breadth of this power was established early on in labor-management arbitrations in the Steelworkers Trilogy.1 There the Supreme Court concluded that by entering into an arbitration agreement, a company and union could commission the arbitrator to bring an informed judgment to bear in reaching a fair resolution. The Court stated: "This is especially true when it comes …


Enforcement Of Foreign Money-Judgments In The United States: In Search Of Uniformity And International Acceptance, Ronald A. Brand Jan 1991

Enforcement Of Foreign Money-Judgments In The United States: In Search Of Uniformity And International Acceptance, Ronald A. Brand

Articles

When international trade and investment increase, so does the need for satisfactory means of dispute resolution. Dispute resolution in national courts requires that litigants consider not only the likelihood of a favorable judgment but also the ability to collect on that judgment. In cases where the defendant’s assets lie in another jurisdiction, collection is possible only if the second jurisdiction will recognize the first jurisdiction’s judgment.

In the international arena, enforcement of United State judgments overseas is often possible only if the United States court rendering the judgment would enforce a similar decision of the foreign enforcing court. This reciprocity …