Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Law
Union Walks In The Sixth: The Integrity Of Mandatory Non-Binding Grievance Procedures In Collective Bargaining Agreements - At & (And) T V. Communications Workers Of America, Afl-Cio, The, Mark Riley Kroeker
Journal of Dispute Resolution
There are many mechanisms short of industrial action which labor unions and employers use to resolve disputes. Anticipating conflict, but aiming to avoid industrial action, the two parties might place an arbitration agreement or other mandatory grievance adjustment procedure into their collective bargaining agreement. This agreement will reflect the parties' understanding as to how disputes are to be resolved. This Note examines the limited circumstances in which the federal courts will enjoin union protest activity carried out in violation of a collective bargaining agreement's provisions regarding dispute resolution. It focuses on the analytic inconsistency of the judicial refusal to enjoin …
Deciding Arbitrability: At&(And)T Technologies, Inc. V. Communications Workers Of America, Sondra B. Morgan
Deciding Arbitrability: At&(And)T Technologies, Inc. V. Communications Workers Of America, Sondra B. Morgan
Journal of Dispute Resolution
Who decides arbitrability-the courts or the arbitrator? The United States Supreme Court recently addressed this issue in the case of AT&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications Workers of America.2 The Court in AT&T reaffirmed its earlier holding from United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.,3 where it held that arbitrability is a matter for judicial determination. 4
Uniform Arbitration Act, The
Journal of Dispute Resolution
In 1955, the Uniform Arbitration Act (UAA) was proposed by the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws.' Since that time, well over half of the states have adopted statutes modeled after the UAA. 2 The purpose of this survey is to explain the principles underlying recent court decisions interpreting the UAA, and provide a framework for analyzing future cases.3
Recent Developments: The Uniform Arbitration Act
Recent Developments: The Uniform Arbitration Act
Journal of Dispute Resolution
The Uniform Arbitration Act (UAA)1 was proposed in 1955 by the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws. Since that time, well over half of the states have enacted statutes modeled after the UAA.2 This survey's purpose is to present and explain recent decisions interpreting the UAA, and assist in analyzing future cases.
Recent Developments: The Uniform Arbitration Act
Recent Developments: The Uniform Arbitration Act
Journal of Dispute Resolution
The Uniform Arbitration Act (UAA), 1 proposed by the National Conference on Uniform State Laws in 1955, has been adopted by slightly more than half the states.' The purpose of this survey is to explain the principles underlying court decisions interpreting the UAA, and provide a framework for analyzing future cases.