Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Law
Re Canada Post Corp And Cupw, Innis Christie
Re Canada Post Corp And Cupw, Innis Christie
Innis Christie Collection
Union grievance filed March 7, 2002 on behalf of all affected employees alleging breach of the Collective Agreement between the parties bearing the expiry date January 31, 2003, in that the Employer violated Articles 2, 11, 13, 15, 17 and all other related provisions of the Collective Agreement by placing full-time supervisor, David Waller, into a full-time letter carrier position/assignment at the Dartmouth Delivery Centre. The Union seeks an order that the Employer remove David Waller from the full-time letter carrier position/assignment and grant full redress to all affected employees under either Article 39.01 or Article 17.04.
Re Canada Post Corp And Cupw (N00-00-00008), Innis Christie
Re Canada Post Corp And Cupw (N00-00-00008), Innis Christie
Innis Christie Collection
The parties have requested a declaratory judgement interpreting Article 20.10 of the Agreement, respecting deduction of sick leave credit. The Union takes the position that the Article applies to employees classified as full-time but only working part of the day due to participation in a work-hardening program or because of a disability being accommodated by the Employer. The Employer's position is that the provision is only intended to apply to absences for part of a full- time shift because of unexpected onset of illness during the shift.