Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Articles 1 - 6 of 6

Full-Text Articles in Law

Re Aliant Telecom Inc And Ac & Twu (Macdonald), Innis Christie Oct 2005

Re Aliant Telecom Inc And Ac & Twu (Macdonald), Innis Christie

Innis Christie Collection

Union Grievance 04-01, dated July 21, 2004, on behalf of the Grievor, Robert MacDonald, alleging that the Employer discharged the Grievor in violation of Article 2.1 of the Collective Agreement between the parties effective January 1, 1999 — January 1, 2002, which the parties agree is the Collective Agreement applicable here. At the outset of the hearing in this matter the parties agreed that I am properly seized of it, that I should remain seized after the issue of this award to deal with any matters arising from its application and that all time limits, either pre-or post-hearing, are waived. …


Re Sisters Of Saint Martha And Caw, Local 2017, Innis Christie Jul 2005

Re Sisters Of Saint Martha And Caw, Local 2017, Innis Christie

Innis Christie Collection

The Grievor believes the Employer should apply the terms of the Labour Standards Code, instead of the less generous Collective Agreement, regarding holiday pay. The Employer paid holiday pay according to the Agreement and believes the grievance should be dismissed.

The grievance fails. The Code does not apply to the employees under the Agreement.


Re Provincial Health Services Authority And Peiupse, Innis Christie Jun 2005

Re Provincial Health Services Authority And Peiupse, Innis Christie

Innis Christie Collection

Grievance by the Union alleging wrongful dismissal of the Grievor, based on allegations of physical abuse of a patient in one of the Employer's health care facilities. The Union has requested pre-hearing production of various documents in the medical file of the patient who made the allegations. The Employer has refused production based mainly on the P.E.I. Mental Health Act, R.S.P.E.I. 1988, c. M-6.1. The parties have agreed that the whether the Employer can and should be ordered to produce the documents in issue is to be decided by the Chair of the Board of Arbitration estab­lished to deal with …


Re Provincial Health Services Authority And Cupe, Loc 805, Innis Christie, B Crockett, S Robinson Jun 2005

Re Provincial Health Services Authority And Cupe, Loc 805, Innis Christie, B Crockett, S Robinson

Innis Christie Collection

Grievance by the Union alleging breach of Article 20.1, and any other applicable articles, of the Collective Agreement between the Union and the Employer effective April 1, 2001 - March 31, 2004, which the parties agreed is the Collective Agreement that governs this matter, in that, when Ronald Smith, a Physio Aide, retired the Employer failed to post that position.


Re Provincial Health Services Authority And Peiupse, Innis Christie May 2005

Re Provincial Health Services Authority And Peiupse, Innis Christie

Innis Christie Collection

Grievance by the Union alleging wrongful dismissal of the Grievor, based on allegations of physical abuse of a patient in one of the Employer's health care facilities. The Union has requested pre­hearing production of various documents in the medical file of the patient who made the allegations. The Employer has refused pro­duction based on the P.E.I. Mental Health Act, R.S.P.E.I. 1988, c. M-6.1. The parties have agreed that the issue of whether the Employer can and should be ordered to produce the documents in issue is to be decided by the Chair of the Board of Arbitration estab­lished to deal …


Re Canada Post Corp And Cupw, Innis Christie May 2005

Re Canada Post Corp And Cupw, Innis Christie

Innis Christie Collection

A previous Grievance which alleged improper staffing was successful and resulted in an Award which required that the affected employees receive an offer for the positions they would have had if filled properly. The Arbitrator retained jurisdiction regarding the implementation of the Award. A subsequent hearing regarding the Grievor resulted in an order to offer her the position she had been denied. The Grievor accepted the position, but with her own conditions. This hearing is to consider if she accepted the position or, by adding conditions, rejected the offer.