Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Articles 1 - 3 of 3

Full-Text Articles in Law

Re Atlantic Pilotage Authority And Canadian Merchant Service Guild, Innis Christie Jun 2004

Re Atlantic Pilotage Authority And Canadian Merchant Service Guild, Innis Christie

Innis Christie Collection

Employee Grievances alleging breach of Article 27.05 of the Collective Agreement between the parties dated October 16, 2000, which the parties agreed is the Collective Agreement that governs this matter, in that the Union alleges that each of the Grievors was given notice of recall in accordance with Article 27.05, each was available for the ten-hour period as required and each submitted a request to be paid in accordance with Article 27.05, which was refused. The Union seeks an order that the Employer pay each Grievor at the rate of pay specified in Article 27.05.


Cupe, Local 3010 V Children's Aid Society Of Cape Breton, Innis Christie Feb 2004

Cupe, Local 3010 V Children's Aid Society Of Cape Breton, Innis Christie

Innis Christie Collection

The Grievor was suspended and then terminated for culminating incidents of performance failures. The Union requests the Grievor be reinstated with full seniority and compensated for all lost pay and benefits.

The grievance succeeds in part. Discipline was appropriate to the situation, but termination was considered excessive in view of the Grievor's seniority and previous work record. The Grievor is reinstated, but without back pay due to the serious nature of the misconduct.


Nova Scotia Barristers' Society V Murrant, Innis Christie, B Wd Badley, Deborah E. Gillis, Kevin Patriquin, Charles T. Schafer Jan 2004

Nova Scotia Barristers' Society V Murrant, Innis Christie, B Wd Badley, Deborah E. Gillis, Kevin Patriquin, Charles T. Schafer

Innis Christie Collection

The Hearing Panel of the Hearing Subcommittee, empanelled by the Chair of the Hearing Subcommittee in accordance with Regulation 40 of the Nova Scotia Barristers' Society Regulations (hereafter, "the Regulations") made under the authority in s. 59 of the Barristers and Solicitors Act, R.S.N.S 1989, as am. (hereafter, "the Act") to hear and decide this matter, consisted of:

Dr. B.W.D. Badley

Innis Christie, Q.C., Chair

Deborah E. Gillis, Q.C.

Kevin J. Patriquin

Dr. Charles T. Schafer

The Panel met to hear evidence and submissions by counsel on October 2 and 3, 2003. The Society was represented by …