Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Agreement (2)
- Arbitration (2)
- Commercial (2)
- Competence (2)
- Competence-competence (2)
-
- Competence-compliance (2)
- FAA (2)
- Federal Arbitration Act (2)
- International commercial arbitration (2)
- Jurisdiction (2)
- Litigation (2)
- Negative competence-competence (2)
- New York Convention (2)
- Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitration Awards (2)
- UNCITRAL (2)
- Breach (1)
- CISG (1)
- Civil Law (1)
- Common Law (1)
- Contract (1)
- Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (1)
- Damages (1)
- Fixed Sum (1)
- Liquidated Damages (1)
- Non performance (1)
- Non-performance (1)
- Penalty Clause (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
Court Litigation Over Arbitration Agreements: Is It Time For A New Default Rule?, Jack Graves
Court Litigation Over Arbitration Agreements: Is It Time For A New Default Rule?, Jack Graves
Scholarly Works
Court litigation over the existence or validity of arbitration agreements is a major threat to the efficacy of international commercial arbitration. While New York Convention Article II(3) requires a court to “refer the parties to arbitration” when faced with a valid and effective arbitration agreement, it fails to provide any guidance with respect to the process for answering that question, thus leaving the issue to national law. A recalcitrant respondent may, therefore, have a variety of options for court challenges—based on a disparate array of national laws—in seeking to delay or at least complicate any claims subject to arbitration. This …
Penalty Clauses And The Cisg, Jack Graves
Penalty Clauses And The Cisg, Jack Graves
Scholarly Works
Commercial agreements often provide for “fixed sums” payable upon a specified breach. Such agreements are generally enforced in civil law jurisdictions. In contrast, the common law distinguishes between “liquidated damages” and “penalty” clauses, enforcing the former, while invalidating the latter as a penalty. The UN Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (CISG) does not directly address the payment of “fixed sums” as damages, and the validity of “penalty” clauses has, traditionally, been relegated to otherwise applicable domestic national law under CISG Article 4. This traditional orthodoxy has recently been challenged—suggesting that the fate of a penalty clause …
Court Litigation Over Arbitration Agreements: Is It Time For A New Default Rule?, Jack Graves
Court Litigation Over Arbitration Agreements: Is It Time For A New Default Rule?, Jack Graves
Scholarly Works
Court litigation over the existence or validity of arbitration agreements is a major threat to the efficacy of international commercial arbitration. While New York Convention Article II(3) requires a court to “refer the parties to arbitration” when faced with a valid and effective arbitration agreement, it fails to provide any guidance with respect to the process for answering that question, thus leaving the issue to national law. A recalcitrant respondent may, therefore, have a variety of options for court challenges—based on a disparate array of national laws—in seeking to delay or at least complicate any claims subject to arbitration. This …