Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Law
Duty To Impair: Failure To Adopt The Federal Rules Of Evidence Allows The Va To Rely On Incompetent Examiners And Inadequate Medical Examinations, 90 Umkc L. Rev. 511 (2022), Yelena Duterte
UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Kimel And Garrett: Another Example Of The Court Undervaluing Individual Sovereignty And Settled Expectations, 76 Temp. L. Rev. 787 (2003), Julie M. Spanbauer
Kimel And Garrett: Another Example Of The Court Undervaluing Individual Sovereignty And Settled Expectations, 76 Temp. L. Rev. 787 (2003), Julie M. Spanbauer
UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Are You My Parent? Are You My Child? The Role Of Genetics And Race In Defining Relationships After Reproductive Technological Mistakes, 5 Depaul J. Health Care L. 15 (2002), Raizel Liebler
UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship
Imagine that you are a married woman who wants to have a genetically related child with your husband. Your doctor tells you that you are infertile, and therefore you and your husband go to XYZ fertility clinic to receive in vitro treatment. You have your eggs harvested, your husband supplies sperm, and ten embryos are created. Five embryos are implanted in your uterus and five are frozen and kept by the fertility clinic for your later use. You successfully conceive and give birth to twins. You notice that the children you give birth to are of a different race than …
The Institutionalized Child's Claim To Special Education: A Federal Codification Of The Right To Treatment, 56 U. Det. J. Urb. L. 337 (1979), Patrick A. Keenan, Celeste M. Hammond
The Institutionalized Child's Claim To Special Education: A Federal Codification Of The Right To Treatment, 56 U. Det. J. Urb. L. 337 (1979), Patrick A. Keenan, Celeste M. Hammond
UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Private Rights Of Action, 27 Depaul L. Rev. 1117 (1978), Michael P. Seng
Private Rights Of Action, 27 Depaul L. Rev. 1117 (1978), Michael P. Seng
UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship
In order for Sections 503 and 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 to practically prohibit employment discrimination against handicapped persons, a broad array of effective and prompt remedies is needed. In this Article, the author examines judicial findings of legislative intent to create private causes of action in the enactment of various civil rights legislation and concludes that a private cause of action is an available mechanism to enforce the federal statutory scheme prohibiting discrimination in the employment of handicapped individuals. While Sections 503 and 504 are silent as to whether a private cause of action exists, Professor Seng …