Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Publication
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Law
Procedurally Criminal: How Peremptory Challenges Create Unfair And Unrepresentative Single-Gender Juries, Chelsea V. King
Procedurally Criminal: How Peremptory Challenges Create Unfair And Unrepresentative Single-Gender Juries, Chelsea V. King
William & Mary Journal of Race, Gender, and Social Justice
No abstract provided.
The Demographic Dilemma In Death Qualification Of Capital Jurors, J. Thomas Sullivan
The Demographic Dilemma In Death Qualification Of Capital Jurors, J. Thomas Sullivan
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
The Negative Effects Of Capital Jury Selection, Andrea Lyon
The Negative Effects Of Capital Jury Selection, Andrea Lyon
Andrea D. Lyon
No abstract provided.
Summary Of Afzali V. State, 130 Nev. Adv. Op. 34, Sean Daly
Summary Of Afzali V. State, 130 Nev. Adv. Op. 34, Sean Daly
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
The Court determined whether a defendant has a constitutional right to know the racial composition of a grand jury that indicted him.
The Federal Death Penalty And The Constitutionality Of Capital Punishment, Scott W. Howe
The Federal Death Penalty And The Constitutionality Of Capital Punishment, Scott W. Howe
Scott W. Howe
The federal death penalty results in few executions but is central to the larger story of capital punishment in the United States. The explanation for its importance lies with its role in resolving the permissible uses of the death penalty under the Eighth Amendment. In the last decade, federal statutes governing the federal death penalty seem to have exerted outsize influence with the Court in its development of “proportionality” doctrine, the rules by which the Justices confine the use of capital punishment under the Constitution. In rejecting capital punishment for retarded offenders, juvenile offenders and child rapists, the Court in …