Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Criminal responsibility (2)
- Insanity plea (2)
- Rochin v. California (2)
- American Bar Association (1)
- Basic rights (1)
-
- Capsules (1)
- Civil Rule 82 (1)
- Commutation of death penalty (1)
- Criminal antitrust case (1)
- Criminal code (1)
- Criminal law (1)
- Criminal procedure (1)
- Death penalty (1)
- Due process (1)
- Equitable justice (1)
- Evidence (1)
- Federal Rule 21(b) (1)
- First degree murder (1)
- Gallegos v. Nebraska (1)
- Homicide (1)
- Illegal detention (1)
- Illegal drugs (1)
- Illegal possession of narcotics (1)
- Illegal search and seizure (1)
- Legal ethics (1)
- Legislation (1)
- Morphine (1)
- Motion to transfer (1)
- Murder (1)
- Nebraska (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 22 of 22
Full-Text Articles in Law
Criminal Law—Coram Nobis, Joseph Taddeo
Criminal Law—Coram Nobis, Joseph Taddeo
Buffalo Law Review
People v. Langan, 303 N. Y. 474, 104 N. E. 2d 861 (1952).
Criminal Law—Venue, Joseph Taddeo
Criminal Law—Venue, Joseph Taddeo
Buffalo Law Review
Murtagh v. Leibowitz, 303 N. Y. 311, 101 N. E. 2d 753 (1951).
Criminal Law—Trial—Reversible Errors, Joseph Taddeo
Criminal Law—Trial—Reversible Errors, Joseph Taddeo
Buffalo Law Review
People v. Ford, 304 N. Y. 679, 197 N. E. 2d 595 (1952); People v. Hetenyi, 304 N. Y. 80, 106 N. E. 2d 20 (1952).
Criminal Law—Written Information, Joseph Taddeo
Criminal Law—Written Information, Joseph Taddeo
Buffalo Law Review
People v. Jacoby, 304 N. Y. 33, 105 N. E. 2d 613 (1952).
Evidence-Confessions-Mcnabb Rule Not Applicable Under The Fourteenth Amendment, Harry T. Baumann S.Ed.
Evidence-Confessions-Mcnabb Rule Not Applicable Under The Fourteenth Amendment, Harry T. Baumann S.Ed.
Michigan Law Review
Defendant, detained on a vagrancy charge in Texas, voluntarily confessed to a homicide committed in Nebraska. Upon his return to the latter state, the defendant repeated his confession and was subsequently arraigned, having been in custody for twenty-five days. The confessions were introduced at the trial and a conviction of manslaughter followed. Defendant, failing to gain a reversal in the state court, sought review by the United States Supreme Court, charging that a failure to arraign the defendant promptly in breach of local statutes was a want of due process under the Fourteenth Amendment. On certiorari, held, affirmed, Justices …
Transfer Of Federal Offenses Committed In More Than One District Or Division, Lester B. Orfield
Transfer Of Federal Offenses Committed In More Than One District Or Division, Lester B. Orfield
Michigan Law Review
Rule 21 (b) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure provides: "The court upon motion of the defendant shall transfer the proceeding as to him to another district or division, if it appears from the indictment or information or from a bill of particulars that the offense was committed in more than one district or division and if the court is satisfied that in the interest of justice the proceeding should be transferred to another district or division in which the commission of the offense is charged."
People V. Evans, Jesse W. Carter
People V. Evans, Jesse W. Carter
Jesse Carter Opinions
A new trial was ordered following a conviction for lewd conduct with a child. It was not in accord with principles of justice and fair play to show the child defendant's picture and then take her into a room where defendant was the only occupant.
Green V. Gordon [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Green V. Gordon [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Jesse Carter Opinions
Commutation of sentence was in nature of a favor and could be granted upon conditions. Therefore, it was within governor's power to commute death sentence to life without parole even though no such statutory penalty existed for murder conviction.
People V. Gilliam [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
People V. Gilliam [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Jesse Carter Opinions
Defendant's conviction of first degree murder and sentence of the death penalty were proper because there was no provocation for his conduct, and the circumstances showed an abandoned and malignant heart together with a consciousness of guilt.
People V. Le Beau [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
People V. Le Beau [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Jesse Carter Opinions
The trial court properly convicted defendant of illegal possession of narcotics because the trial court did not err in permitting the prosecution to impeach its own witness where the prosecution was surprised and prejudiced the prosecution's action.
Constitutional Law-Evidence-Use Of Illegally Obtained Evidence And Due Process Of Law, Allan Neef S.Ed.
Constitutional Law-Evidence-Use Of Illegally Obtained Evidence And Due Process Of Law, Allan Neef S.Ed.
Michigan Law Review
It is fundamental, even in a federal system, that a state be free to regulate the procedure of its courts in accordance with its own conceptions of proper policy, subject only to constitutional limitations safeguarding individuals from arbitrary action by the state. In the United States this constitutional protection is two-fold-both state and federal constitutions acting as limitations on state action. As a result, a problem arises as to what extent the federal courts can, in the enforcement of federal constitutional limitations, override state criminal procedures and the policies underlying them. It is clear that the states have, by virtue …
Insane Persons—Confinement In Penitentiary—Persons Insane At Time Of Commitment—Statutory Provisions, Ray M. Dunlap
Insane Persons—Confinement In Penitentiary—Persons Insane At Time Of Commitment—Statutory Provisions, Ray M. Dunlap
Washington Law Review
D was acquitted of murder by reason of his insanity. The jury returned the statutory special verdict finding that his "insanity or mental irresponsibility" did not exist at the time of the trial but that there was such likelihood of a relapse or recurrence of the condition that D was not a safe person to be at large. D was committed to the state penitentiary as a criminally insane person. Soon after commitment he sought to be discharged from confinement under the procedure set out in RCW 10.76.070 [RRS § 6970; PPC § 133-11]. The prosecuting attorney petitioned for a …
Defendant As A Witness In A Criminal Proceeding, S. Dan Pack
Defendant As A Witness In A Criminal Proceeding, S. Dan Pack
Mercer Law Review
At common law an interested party in a court proceeding was not a competent witness in his own behalf. The basis for disqualifying parties was a notion that the temptation to falsify was too great for the average witness to resist. Any party, therefore, who had any interest whatsoever in the case could not testify. A riper wisdom and experience, however, brought to light the fact that it was better not to close the mouths of interested parties in court proceedings, and statutes were subsequently passed in practically all the English-speaking jurisdictions that would allow an interested party to be …
Constitutional Law—Admission Of Evidence Obtained By Use Of Stomach Pump Violative Of Due Process, Joseph A. Taddeo
Constitutional Law—Admission Of Evidence Obtained By Use Of Stomach Pump Violative Of Due Process, Joseph A. Taddeo
Buffalo Law Review
Rochin v. People of California, 72 S. Ct. 205 (1952).
Destructibility Of Terms For Years: Habeas Corpus And Coram Nobis, David J. Jr. Mahoney, Thomas J. Kelly
Destructibility Of Terms For Years: Habeas Corpus And Coram Nobis, David J. Jr. Mahoney, Thomas J. Kelly
Buffalo Law Review
No abstract provided.
People V. Dessauer, Jesse W. Carter
People V. Dessauer, Jesse W. Carter
Jesse Carter Opinions
A defendant's murder trial did not violate due process where evidence was in form of transcript testimony taken at preliminary examination, agreed to by defendant's counsel and, showed that the issue of guilt and sanity were separately considered.
Recent Cases, Law Review Staff
Recent Cases, Law Review Staff
Vanderbilt Law Review
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE--FACIAL EXPRESSIONS AND GESTICULATIONS OF TRIAL JUDGE--PREJUDICIAL EFFECT ON JURY
================================
EMPLOYMENT SECURITY ACT--PERSONS COUNTED TO DETERMINE WHETHER AN EMPLOYING UNIT HAS REQUISITE NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES TO CONSTITUTE AN "EMPLOYER"--STUDENTS WORKING FOR SCHOOL TO PAY TUITION
=================================
FEDERAL JURISDICTION--JURISDICTIONAL AMOUNT--INJUNCTION SUITS
=================================
LEGAL ETHICS--SOLICITATION AND FEE SPLITTING--ATTORNEY CONTRACTING WITH LABOR UNION TO REPRESENT UNION MEMBERS FOR CONTIGENT FEE
=================================
NEGLIGENCE--LANDOWNER'S DUTY OF CARE--DUTY OWED TO FIREMAN
=================================
NEGLIGENCE--STANDARD OF CARE--ASSURED-CLEAR-DISTANCE-AHEAD RULE
=================================
PERSONAL PROPERTY--TENANCY BY THE ENTIRETY--BANK ACCOUNTS
=================================
PLEADING--GENERAL ISSUE--SCOPE IN TENNESSEE
=================================
TORTS--CHARITABLE INSTITUTIONS--TORT LIABILITY OF CHARITABLE INSTITUTIONS UNDER THE DOCTRINE OF RESPONDEAT SUPERIOR
Evidence—Witnesses—Proof Of Prior Inconsistent Statements, James M. Taylor
Evidence—Witnesses—Proof Of Prior Inconsistent Statements, James M. Taylor
Washington Law Review
D was convicted of second degree assault. The prosecuting attorney, ostensibly for the purpose of laying a foundation for impeachment, asked D questions concerning D's prior inconsistent statements, using a purported manuscript of a wire recording. D neither confirmed nor denied making the statements, answering, "I don't know" or "I don't deny it or confirm it." The prosecutor failed to follow this up on rebuttal by proving or attempting to prove that the prior statements were actually made. Appellant contended this was error. Held: Conviction reversed. Such conduct was extremely prejudicial and constituted reversible error. State v. Yoakum, 137 Wash. …
Coverstone V. Davies [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Coverstone V. Davies [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Jesse Carter Opinions
Because an assembly was unlawful, when police officers arrived upon the scene, they had the authority to arrest all those engaged in the commission of the unlawful act. Thus, warrantless arrests of such individuals were valid.
Insanity As A Defense In Criminal Law, Robert Hall Smith
Insanity As A Defense In Criminal Law, Robert Hall Smith
Kentucky Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Insanity--An Argument For Partial Responsibility, Robert Hall Smith
Insanity--An Argument For Partial Responsibility, Robert Hall Smith
Kentucky Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Codification Of The Criminal Law, Jerome Hall
Codification Of The Criminal Law, Jerome Hall
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.