Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Law
Appeal And Error- Crimes - Evidence Not Objected To At Trial
Appeal And Error- Crimes - Evidence Not Objected To At Trial
Michigan Law Review
The defendant was convicted of murder in the first degree. At the trial, certain incompetent testimony was placed in evidence by the prosecution, to which the defendant's attorney failed to object. The point was sought to be raised on appeal under N. J. Comp. Stat. 1910 sec. 136, which provides that, in criminal cases, if "the plaintiff in error on the trial below suffered manifest wrong or injury, either in the admission or rejection of testimony, whether objection was made thereto or not * * * the appellate court shall remedy such wrong or injury * * * and order …
Appeal And Error-Negligence Or Incompetence Of Counsel
Appeal And Error-Negligence Or Incompetence Of Counsel
Michigan Law Review
Defendant appealed from conviction of murder because of the incompetence and negligence of his attorney in the conduct of the trial. Held, the fact that the defendant was not properly represented by the counsel of his own choice was no ground for the court to go beyond the record and grant a new trial. People v. Hartwell (Ill. 1930) 173 N.E. 112.