Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (21)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (4)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (2)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock William H. Bowen School of Law (2)
- University of Michigan Law School (2)
-
- University of San Diego (2)
- University of the District of Columbia School of Law (2)
- William & Mary Law School (2)
- Brigham Young University Law School (1)
- Florida State University College of Law (1)
- The University of Maine (1)
- UIC School of Law (1)
- University of Kentucky (1)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (1)
- University of Washington School of Law (1)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (1)
- West Virginia University (1)
- Keyword
-
- Capital punishment sentencing (10)
- Capital punishment (6)
- Habeas corpus (3)
- New york constitution (3)
- Right to counsel (3)
-
- United states constitution (3)
- Amendment VI (2)
- Article 1 section 6 (2)
- Capital punishment of offenders with mental disabilities (2)
- Confessions (2)
- Fifth amendment (2)
- History (2)
- Ineffective Assistance of Counsel (2)
- Law enforcement (2)
- Privileges (2)
- Self-incrimination (2)
- Supreme court appellate division third department (2)
- Trials (2)
- Acts Of Assault (1)
- Admissible (1)
- Admission (1)
- Anti Car Theft Act of 1992 (1)
- Appeal (1)
- Appellate procedure (1)
- Arbitrary (1)
- Article I section 6 (1)
- Bans (1)
- Bartel (1)
- Bear Stops (1)
- Blacks (1)
- Publication
-
- Capital Defense Journal (18)
- Touro Law Review (4)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (3)
- Indiana Law Journal (2)
- Michigan Law Review (2)
-
- San Diego Law Review (2)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review (2)
- University of the District of Columbia Law Review (2)
- BYU Law Review (1)
- Florida State University Law Review (1)
- Kentucky Law Journal (1)
- Maine Policy Review (1)
- Maryland Law Review (1)
- UIC Law Review (1)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (1)
- Washington Law Review (1)
- West Virginia Law Review (1)
- William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal (1)
- William & Mary Law Review (1)
Articles 1 - 30 of 46
Full-Text Articles in Law
Visions Of Habeas, David Mccord
Criminal Procedure—Commentary That Binds: The Increased Power Of The United States Sentencing Commission In Light Of Stinson V. United States, 113 S. Ct. 1913 (1993), Todd L. Newton
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
True Blue? Whether Police Should Be Allowed To Use Trickery And Deception To Extract Confessions, Laure Hoffman Roppe
True Blue? Whether Police Should Be Allowed To Use Trickery And Deception To Extract Confessions, Laure Hoffman Roppe
San Diego Law Review
This Comment addresses whether or not, and if so, to what extent, police should be allowed to use trickery and deception to extract confessions from criminal suspects. It surveys the deceitful interrogation tactics included in the term "trickery" and summarizes the psychology of confessions. Major developments in the law regarding coerced confessions are analyzed and the author explores the policy arguments for and against the use of deception in police interrogations. The author recommends the prohibition of specific forms of trickery and offers an analytical approach as to whether a confession is admissible.
Deference, Tolerance, And Numbers: A Response To Professor Wright's View Of The Sentencing Commission, Kevin Cole
Deference, Tolerance, And Numbers: A Response To Professor Wright's View Of The Sentencing Commission, Kevin Cole
San Diego Law Review
The United States Sentencing Commission promulgates the Federal Sentencing Guidelines, which greatly constrain judicial discretion in choosing the sentence for federal crimes. One commentator, Professor Ronald Wright, has argued that the willingness of the courts and Congress to defer to a guideline promulgated by the Commission should depend on whether the Commission has justified the guideline by reference to empirical evidence. This Article explores the theoretical and practical difficulties of giving such effect to empirical justifications.
Breard V. Commonwealth 248 Va. 68, 445 S.E.2d 670 (1994) Supreme Court Of Virginia
Breard V. Commonwealth 248 Va. 68, 445 S.E.2d 670 (1994) Supreme Court Of Virginia
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
The Right To Effective Assistance Of Appellate Counsel, Lissa Griffin
The Right To Effective Assistance Of Appellate Counsel, Lissa Griffin
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Introduction, William S. Geimer
Mcfarland V. Scott 114 S. Ct. 2568 (1994) United States Supreme Court
Mcfarland V. Scott 114 S. Ct. 2568 (1994) United States Supreme Court
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
Turner V. Williams 35 F.3d 872 (4th Cir. 1994) United States Court Of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Turner V. Williams 35 F.3d 872 (4th Cir. 1994) United States Court Of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
Mickens V. Commonwealth 247 Va. 395, 442 S.E.2d 678 (1994) Supreme Court Of Virginia
Mickens V. Commonwealth 247 Va. 395, 442 S.E.2d 678 (1994) Supreme Court Of Virginia
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
Chichester V. Commonwealth 448 S.E.2d 638 (Va. 1994) Supreme Court Of Virginia
Chichester V. Commonwealth 448 S.E.2d 638 (Va. 1994) Supreme Court Of Virginia
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
If At First You Don't Succeed: The Real And Potential Impact Of Simmons V. South Carolina In Virginia, Barbra Anna Pohl, Cameron P. Turner
If At First You Don't Succeed: The Real And Potential Impact Of Simmons V. South Carolina In Virginia, Barbra Anna Pohl, Cameron P. Turner
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
Rethinking The Jury, Phoebe A. Haddon
Rethinking The Jury, Phoebe A. Haddon
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
No abstract provided.
Factors For Reasonable Suspicion: When Black And Poor Means Stopped And Frisked, David A. Harris
Factors For Reasonable Suspicion: When Black And Poor Means Stopped And Frisked, David A. Harris
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Words And Sentences: Penalty Enhancement For Hate Crimes, Shirley S. Abrahamson, Susan Craighead, Daniel N. Abrahamson
Words And Sentences: Penalty Enhancement For Hate Crimes, Shirley S. Abrahamson, Susan Craighead, Daniel N. Abrahamson
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Eliminating Double Talk From The Law Of Double Jeopardy, Eli J. Richardson
Eliminating Double Talk From The Law Of Double Jeopardy, Eli J. Richardson
Florida State University Law Review
No abstract provided.
New York's Loyalty To The Spirit Of "Miranda": Simply The Best For Twenty-Five Years, Lorraine J. Adler
New York's Loyalty To The Spirit Of "Miranda": Simply The Best For Twenty-Five Years, Lorraine J. Adler
Vanderbilt Law Review
The landmark Supreme Court decision Miranda v. Arizona, recognized a defendant's right to be informed of the rights guaranteed by the Fifth Amendment's self-incrimination clause, including the right to counsel. The Miranda Court realized that a suspect may feel compelled to waive his Fifth Amendment privilege while in official detention. The Court held that the police must read the now-familiar warnings to a subject in custodial interrogation before he can waive his rights. Therefore, the Court in Miranda chose to strike the balance between effective law enforcement and protecting a subject's constitutional rights at the point of informing the subject …
Felony-Murder Doctrine Through The Federal Looking Glass, Henry S. Noyes
Felony-Murder Doctrine Through The Federal Looking Glass, Henry S. Noyes
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Challenging Prosecutorial Peremptory Challenges: Little V. United States, Suzanne Frare
Challenging Prosecutorial Peremptory Challenges: Little V. United States, Suzanne Frare
University of the District of Columbia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Mihas V. United States, Jennifer Fox
Mihas V. United States, Jennifer Fox
University of the District of Columbia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Herrera V. Collins: The Gateway Of Innocence For Death-Sentenced Prisoners Leads Nowhere, Vivian Berger
Herrera V. Collins: The Gateway Of Innocence For Death-Sentenced Prisoners Leads Nowhere, Vivian Berger
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.
Schiro V. Farley 114 S. Ct. 783 (1994)
Burden V. Zant 114 S. Ct. 654 (1994)
Spencer V. Murray (Spencer I) 5 F.3d 758 (4th Cir. 1993)
Spencer V. Murray (Spencer I) 5 F.3d 758 (4th Cir. 1993)
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
Smith V. Dixon 14 F.3d 956 (4th Cir. 1994)
Smith V. Dixon 14 F.3d 956 (4th Cir. 1994)
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
Introduction, William S. Geimer
Washington V. Murray 4 F.3d 1285 (4th Cir. 1993)
Washington V. Murray 4 F.3d 1285 (4th Cir. 1993)
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
Spencer V. Murray (Spencer H) 18 F. 3d 229 (4th Cir. 1994)
Spencer V. Murray (Spencer H) 18 F. 3d 229 (4th Cir. 1994)
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
Swann V. Commonwealth 441 S.E. 2d 195 (Va. 1994)
Swann V. Commonwealth 441 S.E. 2d 195 (Va. 1994)
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
Confessions And The Mentally Retarded Capital Defendant: Cheating To Lose, Silvia Linda Simpson
Confessions And The Mentally Retarded Capital Defendant: Cheating To Lose, Silvia Linda Simpson
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.