Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Right to counsel (17)
- Defense (Criminal procedure) (16)
- Defense attorneys (16)
- Legal representation (15)
- Misdemeanors (4)
-
- Appointed counsel (2)
- Criminal law (2)
- Canine sniff (1)
- Capital punishment sentencing (1)
- Civil rights (1)
- Constitutional law (1)
- Criminal justice (1)
- Criminal procedure (1)
- Extenuating circumstances (1)
- Fair trial (1)
- Home (1)
- Lawyers -- Competence (1)
- Police search (1)
- Regulation (1)
- Sentences (Criminal procedure) (1)
- Testimony (Law) (1)
- Vice (1)
- Victimless crime (1)
- Warrantless search (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 22 of 22
Full-Text Articles in Law
A Justified Obligation: Counsel’S Duty To File A Requested Appeal In A Post-Waiver Situation, Lauren Gregorcyk
A Justified Obligation: Counsel’S Duty To File A Requested Appeal In A Post-Waiver Situation, Lauren Gregorcyk
Washington and Lee Journal of Civil Rights and Social Justice
No abstract provided.
Virginia’S Redefinition Of The “Future Dangerousness” Aggravating Factor: Unprecedented, Unfounded, And Unconstitutional , Lara D. Gass
Virginia’S Redefinition Of The “Future Dangerousness” Aggravating Factor: Unprecedented, Unfounded, And Unconstitutional , Lara D. Gass
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Unstoppable V. Unwaivable, Steven Benjamin
Unstoppable V. Unwaivable, Steven Benjamin
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Validating The Right To Counsel, Brandon L. Garrett
Validating The Right To Counsel, Brandon L. Garrett
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Lamentations, Celebrations, And Innovations: Gideon At 50, John D. King
Lamentations, Celebrations, And Innovations: Gideon At 50, John D. King
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Toward A Right To Litigate Ineffective Assistance Of Counsel, Ty Alper
Toward A Right To Litigate Ineffective Assistance Of Counsel, Ty Alper
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Criminal Defense Lawyer Moneyball: A Demonstration Project, Ronald F. Wright, Ralph A. Peeples
Criminal Defense Lawyer Moneyball: A Demonstration Project, Ronald F. Wright, Ralph A. Peeples
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Getting Real About Gideon: The Next Fifty Years Of Enforcing The Right To Counsel, Cara H. Drinan
Getting Real About Gideon: The Next Fifty Years Of Enforcing The Right To Counsel, Cara H. Drinan
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Why Gideon Failed: Politics And Feedback Loops In The Reform Of Criminal Justice, Donald A. Dripps
Why Gideon Failed: Politics And Feedback Loops In The Reform Of Criminal Justice, Donald A. Dripps
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Heeding Gideon’S Call In The Twenty-First Century: Holistic Defense And The New Public Defense Paradigm, Robin Steinberg
Heeding Gideon’S Call In The Twenty-First Century: Holistic Defense And The New Public Defense Paradigm, Robin Steinberg
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Problem With Misdemeanor Representation, Erica Hashimoto
The Problem With Misdemeanor Representation, Erica Hashimoto
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Gideon Skepticism, Alexandra Natapoff
Gideon Skepticism, Alexandra Natapoff
Washington and Lee Law Review
The criminal defense lawyer occupies a special doctrinal place in criminal procedure. It is the primary structural guarantor of fairness, the single most important source of validation for individual convictions. Conversely, if a person did have a competent lawyer, it generates a set of presumptions that his trial was in fact fair, the evidence sufficient, and his plea knowing and voluntary. This is a highly problematic legal fiction. The presence of counsel advances but cannot guarantee fair trials and voluntary pleas. More fundamentally, a lawyer in an individual case will often be powerless to address a wide variety of systemic …
Crashing The Misdemeanor System, Jenny Roberts
Crashing The Misdemeanor System, Jenny Roberts
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Two Rights To Counsel, Josh Bowers
Two Rights To Counsel, Josh Bowers
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Too Poor To Hire A Lawyer But Not Indigent: How States Use The Federal Poverty Guidelines To Deprive Defendants Of Their Sixth Amendment Right To Counsel, John P. Gross
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Shrinking Gideon And Expanding Alternatives To Lawyers, Stephanos Bibas
Shrinking Gideon And Expanding Alternatives To Lawyers, Stephanos Bibas
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
“Potential Innocence”: Making The Most Of A Bleak Environment For Public Support Of Indigent Defense, Robert P. Mosteller
“Potential Innocence”: Making The Most Of A Bleak Environment For Public Support Of Indigent Defense, Robert P. Mosteller
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Gideon Was A Prisoner: On Criminal Defense In A Time Of Mass Incarceration, Abbe Smith
Gideon Was A Prisoner: On Criminal Defense In A Time Of Mass Incarceration, Abbe Smith
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Beyond “Life And Liberty”: The Evolving Right To Counsel, John D. King
Beyond “Life And Liberty”: The Evolving Right To Counsel, John D. King
Scholarly Articles
The majority of Americans, if they have contact with the criminal justice system at all, will experience it through misdemeanor courtrooms. More than ever before, the criminal justice system is used to sort, justify, and reify a separate underclass. And as the system of misdemeanor adjudication continues to be flooded with new cases, the value that is exalted over all others is efficiency. The result is a system that can make it virtually painless to plead guilty (which has always been true for low-level offenses), but that is now overlaid with a new system of increasingly harsh collateral consequences. The …
Drugs, Dignity And Danger: Human Dignity As A Constitutional Constraint To Limit Overcriminalization, Michal Buchhandler-Raphael
Drugs, Dignity And Danger: Human Dignity As A Constitutional Constraint To Limit Overcriminalization, Michal Buchhandler-Raphael
Scholarly Articles
This Article proposes a constitutional constraint to limit criminalization of victimless crimes and, particularly, to alleviate the pressures on the criminal justice system emanating from its continuous “war on drugs.” To accomplish this goal, the Article explores the concept of human dignity, a fundamental right yet to be invoked in the context of substantive criminal law. The U.S. Supreme Court’s jurisprudence invokes conflicting accounts of human dignity: liberty as dignity, on the one hand, and communitarian virtue as dignity, on the other. However, the Court has not yet developed a workable mechanism to reconcile these competing concepts in cases where …
Florida V. Jardines: The Wolf At The Castle Door, Timothy C. Macdonnell
Florida V. Jardines: The Wolf At The Castle Door, Timothy C. Macdonnell
Scholarly Articles
The purpose of this article is to examine the controversy regarding the application of the contraband exception to the home and the potential impact of the Florida v. Jardines decision of the U.S. Supreme Court. The article will begin by examining the cases that make up the Supreme Court's contraband exception and some of the Court's precedent regarding the home and warrantless searches. Next, the article will examine the Florida Supreme Court's holding in Jardines and discuss how the Florida court arrived at the conclusion that the canine sniff in that case was a search. This section will compare the …
Why Strickland Is The Wrong Test For Violations Of The Right To Testify, Daniel J. Capra, Joseph Tartakovsky
Why Strickland Is The Wrong Test For Violations Of The Right To Testify, Daniel J. Capra, Joseph Tartakovsky
Washington and Lee Law Review
A criminal accused has a constitutional right to testify in his own defense. The right has an undisputed place alongside the most important “personal” rights, like the right to remain silent or the right to represent oneself. But in the 1990s, courts began to apply the ineffective-assistance test of Strickland v. Washington to evaluate claims by a defendant that his right to testify was abridged. In practice this nullifies the right. Moreover, the Strickland test is inapposite because it focuses on counsel and not the defendant’s right to testify. This Article proposes a new test to better secure and enforce …