Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Punishment (3)
- Criminal justice (2)
- Fifth Amendment (2)
- Guilt (2)
- Law reform (2)
-
- Police (2)
- Sentencing (2)
- United States Supreme Court (2)
- Capital punishment (1)
- Confessions (1)
- Connecticut (1)
- Criminal justice administration (1)
- Custodial interrogation (1)
- Death penalty (1)
- Deterrence (1)
- Documents (1)
- Double jeopardy (1)
- England (1)
- Execution (1)
- Grand juries (1)
- Griffin v. California (1)
- History (1)
- Homicide (1)
- Indeterminate sentences (1)
- Judicial discretion (1)
- Miranda v. Arizona (1)
- Plea bargaining (1)
- Prosecutors (1)
- Records (1)
- Rehabilitation (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 9 of 9
Full-Text Articles in Law
Interrogation Without Questions: Rhode Island V. Innis And United States V. Henry, Welsh S. White
Interrogation Without Questions: Rhode Island V. Innis And United States V. Henry, Welsh S. White
Michigan Law Review
In Rhode Island v. Innis, the Court defined "interrogation" within the meaning of Miranda; and in United States v. Henry, it defined "deliberate elicitation" within the meaning of Massiah. This article explores the implications of Innis and Henry, suggests readings of the new tests consistent with their purposes, and applies the tests to several situations where the scope of the fifth and sixth amendment protections remains unclear.
The Three Faces Of Double Jeopardy: Reflections On Government Appeals Of Criminal Sentences, Peter K. Westen
The Three Faces Of Double Jeopardy: Reflections On Government Appeals Of Criminal Sentences, Peter K. Westen
Michigan Law Review
Every now and then a case ·comes along that tests the fundamental premises of a body of law. United States v. DiFrancesco presents such a test to the law of double jeopardy, raising the question whether the government may unilaterally appeal a defendant's criminal sentence for the purpose of increasing the sentence. The question cannot be answered by facile reference to the text of the fifth amendment, because the terms of the double jeopardy clause are not self-defining. Nor can it be settled by reference to history, because the issue has not arisen with any frequency until now.
The Fifth Amendment And The Inference Of Guilt From Silence: Griffin V. California After Fifteen Years, Donald B. Ayer
The Fifth Amendment And The Inference Of Guilt From Silence: Griffin V. California After Fifteen Years, Donald B. Ayer
Michigan Law Review
This Article will begin with an examination of the historic (and present) purposes underlying the fifth amendment privilege against self-incrimination, upon which any justification of the no-comment rule must ultimately rest. It will explore the danger that these purposes may be thwarted not only when defendants are actually compelled to be witnesses against themselves, but also when significant burdens are placed on defendants who choose not to testify. In Griffin, the Court reasoned that comment on the defendant's silence amounted to such an impermissible burden. But the Court failed to examine the weight of this burden. This failure makes …
The Process Is The Punishment: Handling Cases In A Lower Criminal Court, Michigan Law Review
The Process Is The Punishment: Handling Cases In A Lower Criminal Court, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
A Book Notice about The Process Is the Punishment: Handling Cases in a Lower Criminal Court by Malcolm M. Feeley
Reforming The Federal Grand Jury And The State Preliminary Hearing To Prevent Conviction Without Adjudication, Peter Arenella
Reforming The Federal Grand Jury And The State Preliminary Hearing To Prevent Conviction Without Adjudication, Peter Arenella
Michigan Law Review
It is this Article's thesis that the substitution of plea-bargaining for the criminal trial as our primary method for determining legal guilt requires a fundamental reassessment of our pretrial screening processes. In a system where the prosecutor's decision to file charges is usually followed by a negotiated guilty plea, we can no longer pretend that the pretrial process does not adjudicate the defendant's guilt. Accordingly, this Article argues that it no longer makes sense to rely primarily on the trial to safeguard essential accusatorial principles when pretrial screening devices like the preliminary hearing and the grand jury perform the only …
Review Of Wiltshire Gaol Delivery And Trailbaston Trials, 1275-1306, Thomas A. Green
Review Of Wiltshire Gaol Delivery And Trailbaston Trials, 1275-1306, Thomas A. Green
Reviews
Ralph B. Pugh's handsome edition of Wiltshire gaol delivery and trailbaston trial rolls for the reign of Edward I provides a valuable resource for scholars of medieval crime and criminal law. The period covered bridges the era of the infrequent general eyres and that of the frequent circuits to try those being held on criminal charges. This transition period saw the development of various institutions and procedures designed to deal with a decline in social stability and an increase in criminal activity. To date, most scholarship has focused either on the workings of the mid-thirteenth- century eyre or on the …
Search And Seizure: A Treatise On The Fourth Amendment, William H. Erickson
Search And Seizure: A Treatise On The Fourth Amendment, William H. Erickson
Michigan Law Review
A Review of Search and Seizure: A Treatise on the Fourth Amendment by Wayne R. LaFave
Sentencing, The Dilemma Of Discretion, Jerold H. Israel
Sentencing, The Dilemma Of Discretion, Jerold H. Israel
Book Chapters
[The following excerpts are taken from Professor Jerold Israel's revision of the late Hazel B. Kerper's Introduction to the Criminal Justice System ( West Publishing Co. 1979), with permission of the author and publisher. Footnotes have been omitted.] As we have seen, judges usually have substantial discretion in sentencing. Most states give them considerable leeway in choosing between probation and imprisonment, in setting the term of imprisonment under either an indeterminate or determinate sentencing structure, in deciding whether a young offender will be given the special benefits of a youthful offender statute, and in determining whether to impose consecutive or …
Desert And Deterrence: An Evaluation Of The Moral Bases For Capital Punishment, Richard O. Lempert
Desert And Deterrence: An Evaluation Of The Moral Bases For Capital Punishment, Richard O. Lempert
Book Chapters
Because the death penalty was so influential in its development, the law of homicide cannot be thoroughly understood without considering the subject of capital punishment. The question of whether or not the State is justified in taking an offender's life has for centuries been fraught with controversy. Moreover, the law on the subject has become enormously complicated as the courts have attempted to assure that the death penalty is fairly administered.