Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Criminal Procedure

University of Baltimore Law

Journal

1986

Articles 1 - 3 of 3

Full-Text Articles in Law

Casenotes: Constitutional Criminal Procedure — Absent A Showing Of Prejudice To The Defendant, Due Process Is Not Violated By Prosecutor's Contact With Counsel For Defense Witness In An Effort To Prevent Perjury. United States V. Teague, 737 F.2d 378 (4th Cir. 1984), Cert. Denied, 105 S.Ct. 913 (1985), Dennis Patrick Mcglone Jan 1986

Casenotes: Constitutional Criminal Procedure — Absent A Showing Of Prejudice To The Defendant, Due Process Is Not Violated By Prosecutor's Contact With Counsel For Defense Witness In An Effort To Prevent Perjury. United States V. Teague, 737 F.2d 378 (4th Cir. 1984), Cert. Denied, 105 S.Ct. 913 (1985), Dennis Patrick Mcglone

University of Baltimore Law Review

No abstract provided.


Casenotes: Criminal Procedure — Juveniles — State Law Authorizing Pretrial Detention Of Juveniles Upon A Finding Of Risk Of Future Criminal Behavior Upheld As Valid Under The Due Process Clause. Schall V. Martin, 104 S. Ct. 2403 (1984), Kim Detrick Jan 1986

Casenotes: Criminal Procedure — Juveniles — State Law Authorizing Pretrial Detention Of Juveniles Upon A Finding Of Risk Of Future Criminal Behavior Upheld As Valid Under The Due Process Clause. Schall V. Martin, 104 S. Ct. 2403 (1984), Kim Detrick

University of Baltimore Law Review

No abstract provided.


Casenotes: Constitutional Criminal Procedure — Despite Discrepancy Between Prior Description And Defendant's Actual Appearance, Eyewitness' Testimony Of Pretrial And In-Court Identifications Of Defendant Is Sufficient Evidence To Sustain A Conviction. Branch V. State, 305 Md. 177, 502 A.2d 496 (1986), Lisa Kristine Hoffman Jan 1986

Casenotes: Constitutional Criminal Procedure — Despite Discrepancy Between Prior Description And Defendant's Actual Appearance, Eyewitness' Testimony Of Pretrial And In-Court Identifications Of Defendant Is Sufficient Evidence To Sustain A Conviction. Branch V. State, 305 Md. 177, 502 A.2d 496 (1986), Lisa Kristine Hoffman

University of Baltimore Law Review

No abstract provided.