Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Appellate review of sentencing (1)
- Ark. R. Crim. P. 17.1 (1)
- Booker v. United States (1)
- Brady (1)
- Brady v. Maryland (1)
-
- Buckley v. Fitzsimmons (1)
- Disclosure (1)
- Due process (1)
- Duty of disclosure (1)
- Echols v. State (1)
- Exculpatory evidence (1)
- Federal Sentencing Guidelines (1)
- Indigent representation (1)
- Ineffective assistance of counsel (1)
- Prosecutorial duty to disclose (1)
- Reciprocal discovery (1)
- Sentencing Reform Act of 1984 (1)
- Strickland's judicial history (1)
- West Memphis Three (1)
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Law
Nearing Thirty Years: The Burger Court, Strickland V. Washington, And The Parameters Of The Right To Counsel, Joshua Kastenberg
Nearing Thirty Years: The Burger Court, Strickland V. Washington, And The Parameters Of The Right To Counsel, Joshua Kastenberg
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
Sentence Appeals In England: Promoting Consistent Sentencing Through Robust Appellate Review, Briana Lynn Rosenbaum
Sentence Appeals In England: Promoting Consistent Sentencing Through Robust Appellate Review, Briana Lynn Rosenbaum
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
Constitutional Law—Sixth Amendment—Braving Confrontation: Arkansas’S Progressive Position Regarding Criminal Defendants’ Confrontation Rights At Sentencing, Cassie R. Howell
Constitutional Law—Sixth Amendment—Braving Confrontation: Arkansas’S Progressive Position Regarding Criminal Defendants’ Confrontation Rights At Sentencing, Cassie R. Howell
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Brady, Arkansas Rule 17.1, And Disclosure Of Scientific Evidence And Expert Opinion, J. Thomas Sullivan
Brady, Arkansas Rule 17.1, And Disclosure Of Scientific Evidence And Expert Opinion, J. Thomas Sullivan
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
The United States Constitution as well as state procedural rules require prosecutorial authorities to disclose evidence to the defense as a means for ensuring fairness in the prosecution of individuals charged with criminal offenses. When prosecutorial authorities fail to disclose evidence as required, the integrity of the criminal justice system is threatened and the defense is unable to adequately prepare for trial. This threat is illustrated and magnified by the substantiation of prosecutorial misconduct claims in high profile trials where prosecutors have been unable to resist the temptation not to disclose evidence that could damage the prosecution's case, or, where …