Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Abortion (1)
- Abortion controversy (1)
- Akron (1)
- And Compromise for the Court (1)
- Arizona V. Youngblood: Does the Criminal Defendant Lose His Right to Due Process When the State Loses Exculpatory Evidence (1)
-
- Bad faith (1)
- Blackmun (1)
- Bright lines (1)
- Citizen complaints (1)
- City of new york (1)
- Crime victim (1)
- Criminal complaint (1)
- Criminal court (1)
- Criminal law (1)
- Criminal procedure (1)
- Criminal prosectution (1)
- Davis (1)
- Defendant (1)
- Destruction (1)
- Direct filing (1)
- Due process (1)
- Enforcement officer (1)
- Evidence (1)
- Fair trial (1)
- Federalism (1)
- Fetus (1)
- Fifth Amendment (1)
- Fourteenth Amendment (1)
- Fourteenth amendment (1)
- Halatyn (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
Arizona V. Youngblood: Does The Criminal Defendant Lose His Right To Due Process When The State Loses Exculpatory Evidence?, Willis C. Moore
Arizona V. Youngblood: Does The Criminal Defendant Lose His Right To Due Process When The State Loses Exculpatory Evidence?, Willis C. Moore
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Sandra Day O’Connor, Abortion, And Compromise For The Court, Susan M. Halatyn
Sandra Day O’Connor, Abortion, And Compromise For The Court, Susan M. Halatyn
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Crime Victim’S "Right" To A Criminal Prosecution: A Proposed Model Statute For The Governance Of Private Criminal Prosecution, Peter L. Davis
The Crime Victim’S "Right" To A Criminal Prosecution: A Proposed Model Statute For The Governance Of Private Criminal Prosecution, Peter L. Davis
Scholarly Works
The thesis of this article is that the public prosecutor should to have a monopoly on criminal prosecutions; some supplementary system of private criminal prosecution should be available. Two such systems, or models, currently exist in New York. The first model, available statewide, theoretically allows a complainant to initiate a non-felony criminal prosecution without any screening by a prosecutor or judge. This system is unwise, unworkable and illusory because it obscures the exercise of judicial discretion and focuses the court’s attention on the wrong issues, usually precluding the crime victim’s complaint. The second model, limited by statute to New York …