Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Law
Arizona V. Washington, 434 U.S. 497 (1978)
Arizona V. Washington, 434 U.S. 497 (1978)
Florida State University Law Review
Criminal Law-MISTRIAL DECLARATION-OVER DEFENDANT'S OBJECTION, PROSECUTION MUST DEMONSTRATE HIGH DEGREE OF MANIFEST NECESSITY OR REPROSECUTION WILL BE BARRED
Emerging Standards In Supreme Court Double Jeopardy Analysis, Clifford R. Ennico
Emerging Standards In Supreme Court Double Jeopardy Analysis, Clifford R. Ennico
Vanderbilt Law Review
The purposes of this Recent Development are as follows: to identify and evaluate recent modifications in the Court's double jeopardy analysis, to propose that the Court's 1977 Term double jeopardy standards dilute the double jeopardy protection previously afforded to criminal defendants, and to suggest that the Court should permit a broader scope of appellate review in double jeopardy cases.