Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Articles 1 - 8 of 8

Full-Text Articles in Law

Mcadams V. Mcsurely, Lewis F. Powell Jr. Oct 1977

Mcadams V. Mcsurely, Lewis F. Powell Jr.

Supreme Court Case Files

No abstract provided.


Punitive Conditions Of Prison Confinement: An Analysis Of Pugh V. Locke And Federal Court Supervision Of State Penal Administration Under The Eighth Amendment, Ira Robbins May 1977

Punitive Conditions Of Prison Confinement: An Analysis Of Pugh V. Locke And Federal Court Supervision Of State Penal Administration Under The Eighth Amendment, Ira Robbins

Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals

The 1960's marked a watershed for the criminal justice system. In such areas as search and seizure, right to counsel and the privilege against self-incrimination, the federal courts first defined substantive constitutional rights and then imposed them upon disinclined functionaries at the state level. At first, these innovations raised thorny questions of constitutional interpretation about the rights involved, but, as is especially visible in the search and seizure area, the debate more recently has focused on the remedy chosen by the Supreme Court for enforcing these rights against the states.' This pattern of escalating federal involvement in the criminal justice …


The Statute Of Limitations In A Criminal Case: Can It Be Waived? May 1977

The Statute Of Limitations In A Criminal Case: Can It Be Waived?

William & Mary Law Review

No abstract provided.


Punitive Conditions Of Prison Confinement: An Analysis Of Pugh V. Locke And Federal Court Supervision Of State Penal Administration Under The Eighth Amendment, Ira P. Robbins Apr 1977

Punitive Conditions Of Prison Confinement: An Analysis Of Pugh V. Locke And Federal Court Supervision Of State Penal Administration Under The Eighth Amendment, Ira P. Robbins

Ira P. Robbins

The 1960's marked a watershed for the criminal justice system. In such areas as search and seizure, right to counsel and the privilege against self-incrimination, the federal courts first defined substantive constitutional rights and then imposed them upon disinclined functionaries at the state level. At first, these innovations raised thorny questions of constitutional interpretation about the rights involved, but, as is especially visible in the search and seizure area, the debate more recently has focused on the remedy chosen by the Supreme Court for enforcing these rights against the states.' This pattern of escalating federal involvement in the criminal justice …


Replacing The Exclusionary Rule With Administrative Rulemaking, Francis A. Gilligan, Fredric I. Lederer Apr 1977

Replacing The Exclusionary Rule With Administrative Rulemaking, Francis A. Gilligan, Fredric I. Lederer

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.


Criminal Defendant's Constitutional Right To Testify - The Implications Of United States Ex Rel. Wilcox V. Johnson, A., Mary Bell Hammerman Jan 1977

Criminal Defendant's Constitutional Right To Testify - The Implications Of United States Ex Rel. Wilcox V. Johnson, A., Mary Bell Hammerman

Villanova Law Review

No abstract provided.


The Opportunity Test Of Stone V. Powell: Toward A Redefinition Of Federal Habeas Corpus, Charles D. Ossola Jan 1977

The Opportunity Test Of Stone V. Powell: Toward A Redefinition Of Federal Habeas Corpus, Charles D. Ossola

Villanova Law Review

No abstract provided.


Learning By Redoing, Review Of A. Von Hirsch, Doing Justice: The Choice Of Punishments, Ira P. Robbins Dec 1976

Learning By Redoing, Review Of A. Von Hirsch, Doing Justice: The Choice Of Punishments, Ira P. Robbins

Ira P. Robbins

Book review of Doing Justice: The Choice of Punishments. By Andrew von Hirsch. New York: Hill & Wang, 1976. Pp. xi, 179. $8.95.