Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Abstain from the fray (1)
- Appeals (1)
- Citron (1)
- Constitutional rights (1)
- Cyber searches (1)
-
- Cyberlaw (1)
- Desegregation (1)
- Ex parte communications (1)
- FBI agents (1)
- Federal Judge (1)
- Filartiga v. Pena-Irala (1)
- First Amendment (1)
- Fourth Amendment (1)
- Government lawyers (1)
- Human rights (1)
- Impartial (1)
- Judicial abilities (1)
- Liberal judge (1)
- Long Shadow of United States v. Rosenberg: A Biographical Perspective on the Hon. Irving Robert Kaufman (1)
- Michelle Zakarin (1)
- Officer inadvertence (1)
- Plain view doctrine (1)
- Political connections (1)
- Presidential Medal of Freedom (1)
- Private practice (1)
- Public eye (1)
- Public service (1)
- Requiring What’s Not Required: Circuit Courts Are Disregarding Supreme Court Precedent and Revisiting Officer Inadvertence in Cyberlaw Cases (1)
- Rights of the press (1)
- Rodger Citron (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Law
The Long Shadow Of United States V. Rosenberg: A Biographical Perspective On The Hon. Irving Robert Kaufman, Rodger D. Citron
The Long Shadow Of United States V. Rosenberg: A Biographical Perspective On The Hon. Irving Robert Kaufman, Rodger D. Citron
Scholarly Works
No abstract provided.
Requiring What’S Not Required: Circuit Courts Are Disregarding Supreme Court Precedent And Revisiting Officer Inadvertence In Cyberlaw Cases, Michelle Zakarin
Requiring What’S Not Required: Circuit Courts Are Disregarding Supreme Court Precedent And Revisiting Officer Inadvertence In Cyberlaw Cases, Michelle Zakarin
Scholarly Works
As the age of technology has taken this country by surprise and left us with an inability to formally prepare our legal system to incorporate these advances, many courts are forced to adapt by applying pre-technology rules to new technological scenarios. One illustration is the plain view exception to the Fourth Amendment. Recently, the issue of officer inadvertence at the time of the search, a rule that the United States Supreme Court has specifically stated is not required in plain view inquiries, has been revisited in cyber law cases. It could be said that the courts interested in the existence …