Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Constitutional law (6)
- Court (6)
- New york (6)
- State (6)
- Constitution (5)
-
- Criminal law (5)
- Due process (5)
- Federal (5)
- Supreme court (5)
- Criminal procedure (4)
- City (3)
- Civil procedure (3)
- Court of appeals (3)
- Discrimination (3)
- Double jeopardy (3)
- Fourteenth amendment (3)
- New york state constitution (3)
- United states constitution (3)
- Appellate (2)
- Bad faith (2)
- Civil law (2)
- Civil rights (2)
- Clause (2)
- Evidence (2)
- Mistrial (2)
- Murder (2)
- Prejudice (2)
- Retrial (2)
- Supreme Court (2)
- Traffic law (2)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 11 of 11
Full-Text Articles in Law
Due Process Supreme Court Appellate Division
Due Process Pringle V. Wolfe (Decided 28, 1996)
Due Process Pringle V. Wolfe (Decided 28, 1996)
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Due Process People V. Scott (Decided June 5, 1996)
Due Process People V. Scott (Decided June 5, 1996)
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Double Jeopardy Supreme Court Appellate Division Second Department
Double Jeopardy Supreme Court Appellate Division Second Department
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Emperor’S New Clothes: An Intersection Of Presidential Immunity And Criminal Accountability, Nicholas J. Maggio
The Emperor’S New Clothes: An Intersection Of Presidential Immunity And Criminal Accountability, Nicholas J. Maggio
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Solitary Confinement Of Juvenile Offenders And Pre-Trial Detainees, Nicole Johnson
Solitary Confinement Of Juvenile Offenders And Pre-Trial Detainees, Nicole Johnson
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
How To Get Away With Murder: The “Gay Panic” Defense, Omar T. Russo
How To Get Away With Murder: The “Gay Panic” Defense, Omar T. Russo
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Disciplinary Regulation Of Prosecutorial Discretion: What Would A Rule Look Like?, Samuel J. Levine
Disciplinary Regulation Of Prosecutorial Discretion: What Would A Rule Look Like?, Samuel J. Levine
Scholarly Works
This Essay is the third part of a larger project examining the potential role of professional discipline in the regulation and supervision of prosecutors’ charging decisions. The first two parts of the project argued that courts have both the authority and the ability to exercise effective disciplinary review of charging decisions through the adoption of ethics rules and their enforcement in the disciplinary process. This Essay takes the next step in the project, considering the nature of rules that courts might adopt, by exploring potential rules targeting two improprieties: arbitrary and capricious charging decisions, and discriminatory charging decisions.