Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- 18 USC 7 (1)
- Adjudicative facts (1)
- Apprendi v. New Jersey (1)
- Civil liberties (1)
- Crimes against humanity (1)
-
- Decisionmaking (1)
- Due Process Clause (1)
- Emergency powers (1)
- Fair trial (1)
- French courts (1)
- Harmless error (1)
- International humanitarian law (1)
- International law (1)
- International tribunals (1)
- Judge (1)
- Judicial notice (1)
- Jurisdictional element (1)
- Jurisprudence (1)
- Jury (1)
- Legal process (1)
- Legislative facts (1)
- National security law (1)
- Politicization (1)
- Preventive detention (1)
- Prison law (1)
- Ring v. Arizona (1)
- Rule 201 (1)
- Separation of powers (1)
- Sixth Amendment (1)
- Special territorial jurisdiction (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
Trust Me, I’M A Judge: Why Binding Judicial Notice Of Jurisdictional Facts Violates The Right To Jury Trial, William M. Carter Jr.
Trust Me, I’M A Judge: Why Binding Judicial Notice Of Jurisdictional Facts Violates The Right To Jury Trial, William M. Carter Jr.
Articles
The conventional model of criminal trials holds that the prosecution is required to prove every element of the offense beyond the jury's reasonable doubt. The American criminal justice system is premised on the right of the accused to have all facts relevant to his guilt or innocence decided by a jury of his peers. The role of the judge is seen as limited to deciding issues of law and facilitating the jury's fact-finding. Despite these principles,judges are reluctant to submit to the jury elements of the offense that the judge perceives to be . routine, uncontroversial or uncontested.
One such …
Politicizing The Crime Against Humanity: The French Example, Vivian Grosswald Curran
Politicizing The Crime Against Humanity: The French Example, Vivian Grosswald Curran
Articles
The advantages of world adherence to universally acceptable standards of law and fundamental rights seemed apparent after the Second World War, as they had after the First. Their appeal seems ever greater and their advocates ever more persuasive today. The history of law provides evidence that caution may be in order, however, and that the human propensity to ignore what transpires under the surface of law threatens to dull and silence the ongoing self-examination and self-criticism required in perpetuity by the law if it is to be correlated with justice.
This Essay presents one side, the dark side, of the …
Preventive Detention: Prisoners, Suspected Terrorists And Permanent Emergency, Jules Lobel
Preventive Detention: Prisoners, Suspected Terrorists And Permanent Emergency, Jules Lobel
Articles
Central to the United States government’s strategy after the September 11th attacks has been a shift from punishing unlawful conduct to pre-empting possible or potential dangers. This strategy threatens to undermine fundamental principles of both constitutional law and international law which prohibit certain government action based on mere suspicion or perceived threat. The law normally requires that the government wait until a person or nation has committed or is attempting to commit a criminal act before it may employ force in response. The dangers of a policy of preventive detention have been analyzed from a number of perspectives. Historians have …