Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Annual Survey of Virginia Law (1)
- Barrett v. Commonwealth (1)
- Blockburger v. United States (1)
- Boyd v. United States (1)
- Brooks v. Commonwealth (1)
-
- Brown v. Commonwealth (1)
- Brown v. Texas (1)
- Burlile v. Commonwealth (1)
- Burns v. Commonwealth (1)
- Cairns v. Commonwealth (1)
- Cartwright v. Commonwealth (1)
- Colaw v. Commonwealth (1)
- Coleman v. Commonwealth (1)
- Commonwealth of Chatman (1)
- Commonwealth v. Evans (1)
- Commonwealth v. Hill (1)
- Commonwealth v. Norton (1)
- Duong v. Commonwealth (1)
- Faretta v. California (1)
- Fishback v. Commonwealth (1)
- Florida v. Bostick (1)
- Florida v. Jimeno (1)
- Florida v. Royer (1)
- Hamlin v. Commonwealth (1)
- Heath v. Commonwealth (1)
- Henry v. Commonwealth (1)
- Herbin v. Commonwealth (1)
- Illinois v. Wardlow (1)
- Johnson v. Commonwealth (1)
- Jones v. Commonwealth (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
Usual Suspects Beware: "Walk, Don't Run" Through Dangerous Neighborhoods, Margaret Anne Hoehl
Usual Suspects Beware: "Walk, Don't Run" Through Dangerous Neighborhoods, Margaret Anne Hoehl
University of Richmond Law Review
The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution is "designed 'to prevent arbitrary and oppressive interference by enforcement officials with the privacy and personal security of individuals." The Amendment is currently interpreted as consisting of two separate clauses, the first generally prohibiting unreasonable searches and seizures, and the second requiring the establishment of probable cause prior to the issuance of a warrant. Hence, only those government searches and seizures requiring a warrant necessitate the establishment of probable cause, and all other searches and seizures simply need to be "reasonable."
University Of Richmond Law Review
University Of Richmond Law Review
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Annual Survey Of Virginia Law: Criminal Law And Procedure, William J. Dinkin, Cullen D. Seltzer
Annual Survey Of Virginia Law: Criminal Law And Procedure, William J. Dinkin, Cullen D. Seltzer
University of Richmond Law Review
Because a large amount of the docket for the Court of Appeals of Virginia is comprised of criminal cases, and since the General Assembly regularly turns its attention to the questions of crime and punishment, in almost any year there are a great number of substantial developments in the criminal law. This past year was no exception. This article surveys developments in criminal law and procedure in Virginia from July 2000 to July 2001. Although this article is intended to survey significant developments over the past year, the reader is cautioned to bear in mind several important caveats.