Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- "parade of horribles"; convictions overturned by evidence of innocence; actual innocence; factual innocence; new-trial motions; petition for state writ of habeas corpus; petition for relief from an illegal sentence; petition for Rule 37 relief; petition for writ of error coram nobis; petition for federal habeas corpus relief; executive clemency; legislative reform; expansion of existing extraordinary writs; relief through state constitutional provisions; promulgation of rules by Arkansas Supreme Court (1)
- Agreement on Privileges and Immunities of the Court (1)
- Appellate review (1)
- Capital claims (1)
- Death penalty appeal (1)
-
- Defense counsel (1)
- Direct appeal (1)
- Due process (1)
- Extra-record evidence (1)
- Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure Rule 11 (1)
- Harmless error (1)
- ICC (1)
- Insanity; death penalty; execution; medicating mentally ill inmates; forced medication; philosophy of death penalty; application of death penalty philosophy to mentally ill inmates; intersection of mental health and criminal law; case law regarding mental health and death penalty; forced medication solely to facilitate execution (1)
- International Criminal Court (1)
- Investigation (1)
- New trial time limits (1)
- Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals (1)
- Post-conviction (1)
- Post-conviction process (1)
- Reality television programming; personal privacy rights; media ride-alongs violate Fourth Amendment; Fourth Amendment respect for the home; media intrusions into the home; home invasions by the media accompanying public authorities; qualified immunity; (1)
- Right to counsel (1)
- Rome Statute (1)
- Scientific evidence (1)
- Treatment of children who commit heinous crimes; blended sentencing; Arkansas's Extended Juvenile Jurisdiction law; EJJ; jurisdiction; loss of minimum age limit for juveniles; EJJ competency requirements; EJJ designation hearing; EJJ review hearing; EJJ records; EJJ and Division of Youth Services commitment; juvenile Department of Correction rules; EJJ waiver and transfer to Circuit Court (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 9 of 9
Full-Text Articles in Law
Available Post-Trial Relief After A State Criminal Conviction When Newly Discovered Evidence Establishes "Actual Innocence", Josephine Linker Hart, Guilford M. Dudley
Available Post-Trial Relief After A State Criminal Conviction When Newly Discovered Evidence Establishes "Actual Innocence", Josephine Linker Hart, Guilford M. Dudley
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
The "Insane" Contradiction Of Singleton V. Norris: Forced Medication In A Death Row Inmate's Medical Interest Which Happens To Facilitate His Execution, Rebecca A. Miller-Rice
The "Insane" Contradiction Of Singleton V. Norris: Forced Medication In A Death Row Inmate's Medical Interest Which Happens To Facilitate His Execution, Rebecca A. Miller-Rice
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Constitutional Law And Criminal Procedure—Media Ride-Alongs Into The Home: Can They Survive A Head-On Collision Between First And Fourth Amendment Rights? Wilson V. Layne, 526 U.S. 603 (1999), Deleith Duke Gossett
Constitutional Law And Criminal Procedure—Media Ride-Alongs Into The Home: Can They Survive A Head-On Collision Between First And Fourth Amendment Rights? Wilson V. Layne, 526 U.S. 603 (1999), Deleith Duke Gossett
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Arkansas's Extended Juvenile Jurisdiction Act: The Balance Of Offender Rehabilitation And Accountability, Connie Hickman Tanner
Arkansas's Extended Juvenile Jurisdiction Act: The Balance Of Offender Rehabilitation And Accountability, Connie Hickman Tanner
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Newly Available, Not Newly Discovered, Penny J. White
Newly Available, Not Newly Discovered, Penny J. White
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
Advances in science have made it possible to discover new evidence. This newly discovered evidence is not always admissible as evidence. This essay suggests methods by which appellate courts may approach a balance between the rigid application of limitation periods in serious criminal cases and admitting evidence that proves innocence.
Expedited Review Of Capital Post-Conviction Claims: Idaho’S Flawed Process, Joan M. Fisher
Expedited Review Of Capital Post-Conviction Claims: Idaho’S Flawed Process, Joan M. Fisher
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
The Anti-Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (“AEDPA”) is a federal attempt to expedite litigation in capital cases. Many states adopted unitary appeal systems in response to the AEDPA. Unitary systems consolidate the direct appeal and state post-conviction process. In Idaho, Idaho Code § 19-4908 establishes special proceedings for capital cases including a forty-two day limitation to present any claims. This article makes a critical analysis of Idaho’s capital post-conviction procedure.
The Response To Brecheen V. Reynolds: Oklahoma’S System For Evaluating Extra-Record Constitutional Claims In Death Penalty Cased, Jeremy B. Lowrey
The Response To Brecheen V. Reynolds: Oklahoma’S System For Evaluating Extra-Record Constitutional Claims In Death Penalty Cased, Jeremy B. Lowrey
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
This article attempts to define the “abuse of discretion” standard of review. The article begins by distinguishing the three types of appellate review. It then focuses on review of discretion. Articles written by Professors Maurice Rosenburg, Robert C. Post, and Judge Henery J. Friendly are next analyzed in order to further evaluate judicial discretionary decisionmaking. Caselaw is next used to discuss how courts have attempted to define and apply the abuse of discretion standard. Primary cases considered include Chevron U.S.A. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Pierce v. Underwood, Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp., and Koon v. United States. Finally, …
Disarray Among The Federal Circuits: Harmless Error Review Of Rule 11 Violations, Brent E. Newton
Disarray Among The Federal Circuits: Harmless Error Review Of Rule 11 Violations, Brent E. Newton
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 governs how a defendant must be counseled when pleading guilty or nolo contendre. Federal Courts of Appeals have held that violation of Rule 11 is harmless error. Since it is harmless error, the lower courts’ decisions are upheld. This article argues that the Federal Courts of Appeals have misapplied the harmless error standard when deciding Rule 11 issues.
The Role And Powers Of Defense Counsel In The Rome Statute Of The International Criminal Court, Kenneth S. Gallant
The Role And Powers Of Defense Counsel In The Rome Statute Of The International Criminal Court, Kenneth S. Gallant
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.