Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Criminal Procedure (22)
- Selected Professional Activities (12)
- 4th amendment (4)
- Exclusionary rule (3)
- Search and seizure (3)
-
- Search warrants (3)
- Automobile searches (2)
- Judicial integrity (2)
- Probable cause (2)
- 6th Amendment (1)
- Article VI (1)
- Australia (1)
- Bennett (1)
- Bush administration (1)
- Civil Procedure (1)
- Civil Rights (1)
- Constitutional Law (1)
- Court jurisdiction (1)
- Court supervisory power (1)
- Criminal cases (1)
- Deliberate elicitation (1)
- Due process principles (1)
- Education Law (1)
- Evidence (1)
- Exclusionary remedy (1)
- Expert testimony (1)
- Extradition Treaty (1)
- False testimony (1)
- Federal criminal justice system (1)
- Foreign Law (1)
- Publication Year
- File Type
Articles 1 - 30 of 45
Full-Text Articles in Law
Small Cells, Big Problems: The Increasing Precision Of Cell Site Location Information And The Need For Fourth Amendment Protections, Robert M. Bloom, William T. Clark
Small Cells, Big Problems: The Increasing Precision Of Cell Site Location Information And The Need For Fourth Amendment Protections, Robert M. Bloom, William T. Clark
Robert M. Bloom
The past fifty years has witnessed an evolution in technology advancement in police surveillance. Today, one of the essential tools of police surveillance is something most Americans carry with them in their pockets every day, the cell phone. Cell phones not only contain a huge repository of personal data, they also provide continuous surveillance of a person’s movement known as cell site location information (CSLI). In 1986, Congress sought to provide some privacy protections to CSLI in the Stored Communication Act. Although this solution may have struck the proper balance in an age when cell phones were a mere novelty …
Panelist, Wrongful Conviction And The Dna Revolution: 25 Years Of Freeing The Innocent, Robert Bloom
Panelist, Wrongful Conviction And The Dna Revolution: 25 Years Of Freeing The Innocent, Robert Bloom
Robert M. Bloom
No abstract provided.
Law Day Panelist On Race And Criminal Justice System, Robert Bloom
Law Day Panelist On Race And Criminal Justice System, Robert Bloom
Robert M. Bloom
Panelist, Cnn Panel Discussing The Film Whitey: Usa V. James J. Bulger, Robert Bloom
Panelist, Cnn Panel Discussing The Film Whitey: Usa V. James J. Bulger, Robert Bloom
Robert M. Bloom
No abstract provided.
The Fourth Amendment Fetches Fido: The Future Of Dog Searches, Robert M. Bloom, Dana L. Walsh
The Fourth Amendment Fetches Fido: The Future Of Dog Searches, Robert M. Bloom, Dana L. Walsh
Robert M. Bloom
For over thirty-five years, the Supreme Court has grappled with the controversial issue of affirmative action and race preference. Beginning with Justice Lewis Powell’s influential opinion in Bakke v. U. Cal. Davis in 1978, leeway has been permitted for admissions policies that take account of race, as long as it is not given determinative weight so as to exclude consideration of nonminority candidates, or used to set quotas. As the Court has become increasingly conservative, however, its license for race preference has tightened considerably, and it has become receptive to “reverse discrimination” plaintiffs challenging such policies in universities and the …
Cases On Criminal Procedure, Robert Bloom
Criminal Procedure: The Constitution And The Police, 6th, Mark Brodin, Robert Bloom
Criminal Procedure: The Constitution And The Police, 6th, Mark Brodin, Robert Bloom
Robert M. Bloom
Examples & Explanations: Criminal Procedure: The Constitution and the Police, Sixth Edition, using the method that has made it such a successful resource for students, continues to present the discussion of criminal procedure in a way that mirrors the sequence of real-life events in law enforcement.
United States V. Leon And Its Ramifications, Robert M. Bloom
United States V. Leon And Its Ramifications, Robert M. Bloom
Robert M. Bloom
No abstract provided.
Labor Law—Labor Management Relations Act—Section 8(B)(1)(A)—Court-Enforced Fines Under A Union-Shop Provision.—Nlrb V. Allis-Chalmers Mfg. Co., Mitchell J. Sikora, Robert S. Bloom
Labor Law—Labor Management Relations Act—Section 8(B)(1)(A)—Court-Enforced Fines Under A Union-Shop Provision.—Nlrb V. Allis-Chalmers Mfg. Co., Mitchell J. Sikora, Robert S. Bloom
Robert M. Bloom
No abstract provided.
Border Searches In The Age Of Terrorism, Robert M. Bloom
Border Searches In The Age Of Terrorism, Robert M. Bloom
Robert M. Bloom
This article will first explore the history of border searches. It will look to the reorganization of the border enforcement apparatus resulting from 9/11 as well as the intersection of the Fourth Amendment and border searches generally. Then, it will analyze the Supreme Court's last statement on border searches in the Flores-Montano27 decision, including what impact this decision has had on the lower courts. Finally, the article will focus on Fourth Amendment cases involving terrorism concerns after 9/11, as a means of drawing some conclusions about the effect the emerging emphasis on terrorism and national security concerns will likely have …
Jailhouse Informants, Robert M. Bloom
“A More Majestic Conception:” The Importance Of Judicial Integrity In Preserving The Exclusionary Rule, Robert M. Bloom, David H. Fentin
“A More Majestic Conception:” The Importance Of Judicial Integrity In Preserving The Exclusionary Rule, Robert M. Bloom, David H. Fentin
Robert M. Bloom
In Mapp v. Ohio (1961), the Warren Court held that the so-called exclusionary rule was applicable to the states. Subsequent Supreme Courts have shown their disenchantment with the rule by seeking to curb its applicability. Most recently, the Court has characterized the exclusionary rule as a “massive remedy” to be applied only as a “last resort.” The Courts’ analytical framework for the last thirty-five years for cutting back the exclusionary rule was a balancing test which weighed the costs of suppressing reliable evidence with the benefits of deterring future police violations. This balancing has been used most recently in two …
Warrant Requirement -- The Burger Court Approach, Robert M. Bloom
Warrant Requirement -- The Burger Court Approach, Robert M. Bloom
Robert M. Bloom
No abstract provided.
Judicial Integrity: A Call For Its Re-Emergence In The Adjudication Of Criminal Cases, Robert M. Bloom
Judicial Integrity: A Call For Its Re-Emergence In The Adjudication Of Criminal Cases, Robert M. Bloom
Robert M. Bloom
A court can invalidate or rectify certain kinds of offensive official action on the grounds of judicial integrity. In the past, it has served as a check on overzealous law enforcement agents whose actions so seriously impaired due process principles that they shocked the bench’s conscience. The principle not only preserves the judiciary as a symbol of lawfulness and justice, but it also insulates the courts from becoming aligned with illegal actors and their bad acts. The 1992 case of U.S. v. Alvarez-Machain, however, may have signaled a departure from past practices. This article reviews current Supreme Court cases and …
The Constitutional Infirmity Of Warrantless Nsa Surveillance: The Abuse Of Presidential Power And The Injury To The Fourth Amendment, Robert M. Bloom, William J. Dunn
The Constitutional Infirmity Of Warrantless Nsa Surveillance: The Abuse Of Presidential Power And The Injury To The Fourth Amendment, Robert M. Bloom, William J. Dunn
Robert M. Bloom
In recent months, there have been many revelations about the tactics used by the Bush Administration to prosecute their war on terrorism. These stories involve the exploitation of technologies that allow the government, with the cooperation of phone companies and financial institutions, to access phone and financial records. This paper focuses on the revelation and widespread criticism of the Bush Administration’s operation of a warrantless electronic surveillance program to monitor international phone calls and emails that originate or terminate with a United States party. The powerful and secret National Security Agency heads the program and leverages its significant intelligence collection …
Inevitable Discovery: An Exception Beyond The Fruits, Robert M. Bloom
Inevitable Discovery: An Exception Beyond The Fruits, Robert M. Bloom
Robert M. Bloom
No abstract provided.
Accounting For Federalism In State Courts - Exclusion Of Evidence Obtained Lawfully By Federal Agents, Robert M. Bloom, Hillary J. Massey
Accounting For Federalism In State Courts - Exclusion Of Evidence Obtained Lawfully By Federal Agents, Robert M. Bloom, Hillary J. Massey
Robert M. Bloom
After the terrorist attacks on September 11th, Congress greatly enhanced federal law enforcement powers through enactment of the U.S.A. Patriot Act. The Supreme Court also has provided more leeway to federal officers in the past few decades, for example by limiting the scope of the exclusionary rule. At the same time, many states have interpreted their constitutions to provide greater individual protections to their citizens than provided by the federal constitution. This phenomenon has sometimes created a wide disparity between the investigatory techniques available to federal versus state law enforcement officers. As a result, state courts sometimes must decide whether …
The Supreme Court And Its Purported Preference For Search Warrants, Robert M. Bloom
The Supreme Court And Its Purported Preference For Search Warrants, Robert M. Bloom
Robert M. Bloom
No abstract provided.
Cases On Criminal Procedure, Robert Bloom
When Rights Become Empty Promises: Promoting An Exclusionary Rule That Vindicates Personal Rights, Robert Bloom, Erin Dewey
When Rights Become Empty Promises: Promoting An Exclusionary Rule That Vindicates Personal Rights, Robert Bloom, Erin Dewey
Robert M. Bloom
The United States has played a leading role in the development of the exclusionary rule since Weeks v. United States (1914). The original exclusionary rule justification set out in Weeks is the vindication principle which operates so as to exclude unconstitutionally obtained evidence for the purpose of vindicating the rights of the accused. In this way the exclusion of evidence provides a remedy to the victim of an illegality by maintaining the status quo ante. The U.S. Supreme Court observed in Wolf v Colorado (1949) that “[o]f 10 jurisdictions within the United Kingdom and the British Commonwealth of Nations which …
U.S. Exclusionary Rule: A Comparative Analysis, Robert Bloom
U.S. Exclusionary Rule: A Comparative Analysis, Robert Bloom
Robert M. Bloom
No abstract provided.
History Of American Legal Education, With An Emphasis On Clinical Education, Robert Bloom
History Of American Legal Education, With An Emphasis On Clinical Education, Robert Bloom
Robert M. Bloom
No abstract provided.
The Odyssey Of The United States Road To Torture-How Did The United States Become A Waterboarder?, Robert Bloom
The Odyssey Of The United States Road To Torture-How Did The United States Become A Waterboarder?, Robert Bloom
Robert M. Bloom
United States after 9/11 decided to ignore various international laws and engaged in torture. Talk focused on how a democratic nation with high moral values could engage in such activity
Drug Testing In Public Schools, Robert Bloom
Border Searches, Terrorism, And The Fourth Amendment, Robert Bloom
Border Searches, Terrorism, And The Fourth Amendment, Robert Bloom
Robert M. Bloom
No abstract provided.
Debate On Fourth Amendment Issues In Homeland Security Law, Robert Bloom
Debate On Fourth Amendment Issues In Homeland Security Law, Robert Bloom
Robert M. Bloom
No abstract provided.
Terry V.Ohio, Massiah V. United States, And Zurcher V. Stanford Daily, Robert Bloom
Terry V.Ohio, Massiah V. United States, And Zurcher V. Stanford Daily, Robert Bloom
Robert M. Bloom
No abstract provided.
The Story Of Pottawatomie County V. Lindsay Earls: Drug Testing In The Public Schools, Robert Bloom
The Story Of Pottawatomie County V. Lindsay Earls: Drug Testing In The Public Schools, Robert Bloom
Robert M. Bloom
No abstract provided.
Jury Trial In Japan, Robert Bloom
Federal Rules Of Civil Procedure. Rule 55 – Default Judgement, Robert Bloom
Federal Rules Of Civil Procedure. Rule 55 – Default Judgement, Robert Bloom
Robert M. Bloom
No abstract provided.