Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 24 of 24
Full-Text Articles in Law
Appointed Counsel And Jury Trial: The Rights That Undermine The Other Rights, Russell L. Christopher
Appointed Counsel And Jury Trial: The Rights That Undermine The Other Rights, Russell L. Christopher
Washington and Lee Law Review
Do the Sixth Amendment rights to appointed counsel and jury trial unconstitutionally conflict with defendants’ other constitutional rights? For indigents charged with felonies, Gideon v. Wainwright guarantees the right to appointed counsel; for misdemeanors, Scott v. Illinois limits the right to indigents receiving the most severe authorized punishment—imprisonment.Duncan v. Illinois limits the right to jury trial to defendants charged with serious offenses. Consequently, the greater the jeopardy faced by defendants, the greater the eligibility for appointed counsel and jury trial. But defendants’ other constitutional rights generally facilitate just the opposite— minimizing jeopardy by reducing charges, lessening the likelihood of …
Constitutional Clause Aggregation And The Marijuana Crimes, Scott W. Howe
Constitutional Clause Aggregation And The Marijuana Crimes, Scott W. Howe
Washington and Lee Law Review
An important question for our time concerns whether the Constitution could establish a right to engage in certain marijuana-related activities. Several states have now legalized cannabis, within strict limits, for recreational purposes, and that number will grow. Yet, some states will not promptly legalize but, instead, continue to criminalize, or only “decriminalize” in minor ways, and the federal criminalization statutes also will likely survive for a time. There currently is no recognized right under the Constitution to possess, use, cultivate, or distribute cannabis for recreational purposes, even in small amounts, and traditional, single-clause arguments for such a right are weak. …
Deconstructing The Epistemic Challenges To Mass Atrocity Prosecutions, Nancy Amoury Combs
Deconstructing The Epistemic Challenges To Mass Atrocity Prosecutions, Nancy Amoury Combs
Washington and Lee Law Review
Mass atrocity prosecutions are credited with advancing a host of praiseworthy objectives. They are believed to impose much-needed retribution, deter future atrocities, and affirm the rule of law in previously lawless societies. However, mass atrocity prosecutions will accomplish none of these laudable ends unless they are able to find accurate facts. Convicting the appropriate individuals of the appropriate crimes is a necessary and foundational condition for the success of mass atrocity prosecutions. But it is a condition that is frequently difficult to meet, as mass atrocity prosecutions are often bedeviled by pervasive and invidious obstacles to accurate fact-finding. This Article …
Criminal Adjudication, Error Correction, And Hindsight Blind Spots, Lisa Kern Griffin
Criminal Adjudication, Error Correction, And Hindsight Blind Spots, Lisa Kern Griffin
Washington and Lee Law Review
Concerns about hindsight in the law typically arise with regard to the bias that outcome knowledge can produce. But a more difficult problem than the clear view that hindsight appears to provide is the blind spot that it actually has. Because of the conventional wisdom about error review, there is a missed opportunity to ensure meaningful scrutiny. Beyond the confirmation biases that make convictions seem inevitable lies the question whether courts can see what they are meant to assess when they do look closely for error. Standards that require a retrospective showing of materiality, prejudice, or harm turn on what …
Two Models Of Pre-Plea Discovery In Criminal Cases: An Empirical Comparison, Jenia I. Turner, Allison D. Redlich George Mason University
Two Models Of Pre-Plea Discovery In Criminal Cases: An Empirical Comparison, Jenia I. Turner, Allison D. Redlich George Mason University
Washington and Lee Law Review
Our criminal justice system resolves most of its cases through plea bargains. Yet the U.S. Supreme Court has not required that any evidence, even exculpatory or impeachment evidence, be provided to the defense before a guilty plea. As a result, state rules on pre-plea discovery differ widely. While some jurisdictions follow an “open-file” model, imposing relatively broad discovery obligations on prosecutors early in the criminal process, others follow a more restrictive, “closed-file” model and allow the prosecution to avoid production of critical evidence either entirely or until very near the time of trial. Though the advantages and disadvantages of both …
The Admissibility Of Trueallele: A Computerized Dna Interpretation System, Katherine L. Moss
The Admissibility Of Trueallele: A Computerized Dna Interpretation System, Katherine L. Moss
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Irrelevance Of Prisoner Fault For Excessively Delayed Executions, Russell L. Christopher
The Irrelevance Of Prisoner Fault For Excessively Delayed Executions, Russell L. Christopher
Washington and Lee Law Review
Are decades-long delays between sentencing and execution immune from Eighth Amendment violation because they are self-inflicted by prisoners, or is such prisoner fault for delays simply irrelevant to whether a state-imposed punishment is cruel and unusual? Typically finding delay to be the state’s responsibility, Justices Breyer and Stevens argue that execution following upwards of forty years of death row incarceration is unconstitutional. Nearly every lower court disagrees, reasoning that prisoners have the choice of pursuing appellate and collateral review (with the delay that entails) or crafting the perfect remedy to any delay by submitting, as Justice Thomas has invited complaining …
Comment On The Prior Convictions Exception: Examining The Continuing Viability Of Almendarez-Torres Under Alleyne, Kevin Flynn
Comment On The Prior Convictions Exception: Examining The Continuing Viability Of Almendarez-Torres Under Alleyne, Kevin Flynn
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Prior Convictions Exception—A Comment, Matthew Engle
The Prior Convictions Exception—A Comment, Matthew Engle
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Prior Convictions Exception: Examining The Continuing Viability Of Almendarez-Torres Under Alleyne, Meg E. Sawyer
The Prior Convictions Exception: Examining The Continuing Viability Of Almendarez-Torres Under Alleyne, Meg E. Sawyer
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
For The Criminal Practitioner Review Of Fourth Circuit Opinions In Criminal Cases Decided In Calendar Year 1992, Carl Horn
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Booth V. Maryland, Insights Into The Contemporary Challenges To Judging, Joan M. Shaughnessy
Booth V. Maryland, Insights Into The Contemporary Challenges To Judging, Joan M. Shaughnessy
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Presence Requirement And The "Police-Team" Rule In Arrest For Misdemeanors
The Presence Requirement And The "Police-Team" Rule In Arrest For Misdemeanors
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Operating A Motor Vehicle While Under The Influence
Operating A Motor Vehicle While Under The Influence
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Criminal Culpability For Defense Of Third Persons
Criminal Culpability For Defense Of Third Persons
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Invitee And Retreat Rule In Criminal Law
Invitee And Retreat Rule In Criminal Law
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Remarks About Appeal As Prejudicial In Criminal Cases
Remarks About Appeal As Prejudicial In Criminal Cases
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Burden Of Proof As To Perpetrators Of Crimes
Burden Of Proof As To Perpetrators Of Crimes
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Three Modern Problems In Criminal Law, E. Barrett Prettyman
Three Modern Problems In Criminal Law, E. Barrett Prettyman
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Criminally Enforceable Duty To Act
Criminally Enforceable Duty To Act
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Federal Assistance In The Enforcement Of State Criminal Law
Federal Assistance In The Enforcement Of State Criminal Law
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Felony Murder, Transferred Intent, And The Palsgraf Doctrine In The Criminal Law, Wilfred J. Ritz
Felony Murder, Transferred Intent, And The Palsgraf Doctrine In The Criminal Law, Wilfred J. Ritz
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Federal Assimilative Crimes Act: How Much State Law?
Federal Assimilative Crimes Act: How Much State Law?
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Entrapment Re-Examined By United States Supreme Court
Entrapment Re-Examined By United States Supreme Court
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.