Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Criminal justice (3)
- Mass incarceration (3)
- Prisons (3)
- Punishment (3)
- Sentencing (3)
-
- Crimes (2)
- Law reform (2)
- African Americans (1)
- Ambiguity (1)
- Capital punishment (1)
- Cities (1)
- Communities (1)
- Consensus (1)
- Criminalization (1)
- Death penalty (1)
- Eighth Amendment (1)
- Hedge funds (1)
- History (1)
- Insider trading (1)
- Legitimacy (1)
- Minorities (1)
- Prisoners (1)
- Prosecutorial power (1)
- Prosecutors (1)
- Race and law (1)
- Securities Exchange Act (1)
- Securities and Exchange Commission (1)
- Securities fraud (1)
- Securities regulation (1)
- United States Supreme Court (1)
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Law
Reassessing Prosecutorial Power Through The Lens Of Mass Incarceration, Jeffrey Bellin
Reassessing Prosecutorial Power Through The Lens Of Mass Incarceration, Jeffrey Bellin
Michigan Law Review
A review of John F. Pfaff, Locked In: The True Causes of Mass Incarceration - And How to Achieve Real Reform.
Insider Trading Law And The Ambiguous Quest For Edge, A. C. Pritchard
Insider Trading Law And The Ambiguous Quest For Edge, A. C. Pritchard
Michigan Law Review
A review of Sheelah Kolhatkar, Black Edge.
Criminal Justice And The Mattering Of Lives, Deborah Tuerkheimer
Criminal Justice And The Mattering Of Lives, Deborah Tuerkheimer
Michigan Law Review
A review of James Forman Jr., Locking Up Our Own: Crime and Punishment in Black America.
All Bathwater, No Baby: Expressive Theories Of Punishment And The Death Penalty, Susan A. Bandes
All Bathwater, No Baby: Expressive Theories Of Punishment And The Death Penalty, Susan A. Bandes
Michigan Law Review
A review of Carol S. Steiker and Jordan M. Steiker, Courting Death: The Supreme Court and Capital Punishment.
The Consensus Myth In Criminal Justice Reform, Benjamin Levin
The Consensus Myth In Criminal Justice Reform, Benjamin Levin
Michigan Law Review
It has become popular to identify a “consensus” on criminal justice reform, but how deep is that consensus, actually? This Article argues that the purported consensus is much more limited than it initially appears. Despite shared reformist vocabulary, the consensus rests on distinct critiques that identify different flaws and justify distinct policy solutions. The underlying disagreements transcend traditional left/right political divides and speak to deeper disputes about the state and the role of criminal law in society.
The Article maps two prevailing, but fundamentally distinct, critiques of criminal law: (1) the quantitative approach (what I call the “over” frame); and …