Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Fifth Amendment (3)
- 18 U.S.C. 844 (1)
- 3.220 (1)
- Agurs (1)
- Allen (1)
-
- Bad faith (1)
- Bostic (1)
- Boyd v. U.S. (1)
- Brady v. Maryland (1)
- Byer v. Willard (1)
- Castle doctrine (1)
- Clark (1)
- Cohabitants (1)
- Contemporaneous objection (1)
- Cotenant (1)
- Criminal procedure (1)
- Dawson (1)
- Determinacy (1)
- Discovery (1)
- Dissent (1)
- Documentary evidence (1)
- Dorszynski (1)
- Double jeopardy (1)
- Downum (1)
- Duty to retreat (1)
- Employment (1)
- Ex-offender (1)
- FYCA (1)
- Florida (1)
- Fourth District Court of Appeal (1)
Articles 1 - 7 of 7
Full-Text Articles in Law
Conner V. State, 361 So.2d 774 (Fla. 4th Dist. Ct. App. 1978), Cert. Denied, 368 So. 2d 1364, Timothy C. Herbert
Conner V. State, 361 So.2d 774 (Fla. 4th Dist. Ct. App. 1978), Cert. Denied, 368 So. 2d 1364, Timothy C. Herbert
Florida State University Law Review
Criminal Law-SELF-DEFENSE-RETREAT-INSTRUCTION ON DEFENSE OF HOME NEED NOT BE GIVEN WHERE VICTIM AND ACCUSED ARE MEMBERS OF SAME HOUSEHOLD
Does The Federal Youth Corrections Act Remove The "Leper's Bell" From Rehabilitated Offenders?, Richard S. Harnsberger
Does The Federal Youth Corrections Act Remove The "Leper's Bell" From Rehabilitated Offenders?, Richard S. Harnsberger
Florida State University Law Review
No abstract provided.
". . . We Are The Living Proof . . . ", Ray Wilson
". . . We Are The Living Proof . . . ", Ray Wilson
Florida State University Law Review
Second Edition. By David Fogel. Chicago: Anderson Publishing Co. 1979. Pp. xxi, 338. $10.95.
State V. Sobel, 363 So.2d 324 (Fla. 1978), Michael T. Webster
State V. Sobel, 363 So.2d 324 (Fla. 1978), Michael T. Webster
Florida State University Law Review
Constitutional Law-DUE PROCESS NOT VIOLATED BY STATE'S DESTRUCTION AND NONDISCLOSURE OF TAPE RECORDING IN CRIMINAL LAW
Arizona V. Washington, 434 U.S. 497 (1978)
Arizona V. Washington, 434 U.S. 497 (1978)
Florida State University Law Review
Criminal Law-MISTRIAL DECLARATION-OVER DEFENDANT'S OBJECTION, PROSECUTION MUST DEMONSTRATE HIGH DEGREE OF MANIFEST NECESSITY OR REPROSECUTION WILL BE BARRED
Clark V. State, 363 So. 2d 333 (Fla. 1978), Shawn Ettingoff
Clark V. State, 363 So. 2d 333 (Fla. 1978), Shawn Ettingoff
Florida State University Law Review
Criminal Law-RIGHT TO REMAIN SILENT-OBJECTION AND MOTION FOR MISTRIAL NOW REQUIRED TO PRESERVE IMPROPER COMMENT ON THE DEFENDANT'S SILENCE FOR APPELLATE REVIEW
Tsavaris V. Scruggs, 360 So. 2d 745 (Fla. 1977), Elizabeth J. Daniels
Tsavaris V. Scruggs, 360 So. 2d 745 (Fla. 1977), Elizabeth J. Daniels
Florida State University Law Review
Constitutional Law-SELF-INCRIMINATION-FLORIDA SUPREME COURT SIGNALS POSSIBLE RETREAT IN PROTECTION AGAINST COMPULSORY PRODUCTION OF INCRIMINATING DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE.