Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- 2 USC 192 (1)
- 2 USC 194 (1)
- Attorney-Client (1)
- Attorney-Client Privilege (1)
- Chairman's letter (1)
-
- Congress (1)
- Congressional investigation (1)
- Congressional investigations (1)
- Contempt (1)
- Contempt of congress (1)
- Corporate privilege waiver (1)
- First Amendment (1)
- Holder Memo (1)
- Inherent contempt (1)
- Inherent contempt power (1)
- Internal Investigation (1)
- Law and Society (1)
- Legislation (1)
- McNulty Memo (1)
- Practice and Procedure (1)
- Privilege waiver (1)
- Rule 30(b)(6) (1)
- Thompson Memo (1)
- Waiver (1)
- White collar crime (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Law
Where Did My Privilege Go? Congress And Its Discretion To Ignore The Attorney-Client Privilege, Don Berthiaume, Jeffrey Ansley
Where Did My Privilege Go? Congress And Its Discretion To Ignore The Attorney-Client Privilege, Don Berthiaume, Jeffrey Ansley
Don R Berthiaume
“The right to counsel is too important to be passed over for prosecutorial convenience or executive branch whimsy. It has been engrained in American jurisprudence since the 18th century when the Bill of Rights was adopted... However, the right to counsel is largely ineffective unless the confidential communications made by a client to his or her lawyer are protected by law.”[1] So said Senator Arlen Specter on February 13, 2009, just seven months before Congress chose to ignore the very privilege he lauded. Why then, if the right to counsel is as important as Senator Specter articulated, does Congress maintain …
Just The Facts: Solving The Corporate Privilege Waiver Dilemma, Don R. Berthiaume
Just The Facts: Solving The Corporate Privilege Waiver Dilemma, Don R. Berthiaume
Don R Berthiaume
How can corporations provide “just the facts” — which are, in fact, not privileged — without waiving the attorney client privilege and work product protection? This article argues for an addition to the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure based upon Rule 30(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, which allows civil litigants to issue a subpoena to an organization and cause them to “designate one or more officers, directors, or managing agents, or designate other persons who consent to testify on its behalf … about information known or reasonably available to the organization.”[6] Why should we look to Fed. …