Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Boxing regulations (1)
- HIV testing (1)
- Incompetent criminal defendant; incompetency doctrine; criminal procedure; competency law practices; (1)
- Prosecutorial misconduct; proper scope of argument; limitations on closing argument; preservation of error for appellate review; appellate disposition of improper argument claims; (1)
- Sports regulations (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
Prosecutorial Misconduct In Closing Argument In Arkansas Criminal Trials, J. Thomas Sullivan
Prosecutorial Misconduct In Closing Argument In Arkansas Criminal Trials, J. Thomas Sullivan
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Mandatory Hiv Testing Of Professional Boxers: An Unconstitutional Effort To Regulate A Sport That Needs To Be Regulated, Michael T. Flannery, Raymond C. O'Brien
Mandatory Hiv Testing Of Professional Boxers: An Unconstitutional Effort To Regulate A Sport That Needs To Be Regulated, Michael T. Flannery, Raymond C. O'Brien
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Criminal Procedure—Crazy As I Need To Be: The United States Supreme Court's Latest Addition To The Incompetency Doctrine. Cooper V. Oklahoma, 116 S. Ct. 1373 (1996)., S. Christopher Thomason
Criminal Procedure—Crazy As I Need To Be: The United States Supreme Court's Latest Addition To The Incompetency Doctrine. Cooper V. Oklahoma, 116 S. Ct. 1373 (1996)., S. Christopher Thomason
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.