Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Criminal law (3)
- Culpability (2)
- Felony murder (2)
- Homicide (2)
- Bentham (1)
-
- Cross-Gender Search (1)
- Cross-Sex Search (1)
- Foucault (1)
- Fourth Amendment (1)
- Gender (1)
- Incarceration (1)
- Institutions (1)
- Motive (1)
- Prison (1)
- Prisoner (1)
- Privacy (1)
- Punishment (1)
- Search (1)
- Sex (1)
- Sexual Abuse (1)
- Statutory interpretation (1)
- Subculture (1)
- Surveillance (1)
- Transparency (1)
- Utilitarianism (1)
- Women (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 7 of 7
Full-Text Articles in Law
When Are Children Adults? Juveniles On Trial As Adults: Adults On Trial As Juveniles, Suzanne M. Knight
When Are Children Adults? Juveniles On Trial As Adults: Adults On Trial As Juveniles, Suzanne M. Knight
Buffalo Women's Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Karo Kari: Honor Killing, Wendy M. Gonzalez
Karo Kari: Honor Killing, Wendy M. Gonzalez
Buffalo Women's Law Journal
No abstract provided.
The Influence Of Pornography On Rape And Violence Against Women: A Social Science Approach, Dana A. Fraytak
The Influence Of Pornography On Rape And Violence Against Women: A Social Science Approach, Dana A. Fraytak
Buffalo Women's Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Felony Murder And Mens Rea Default Rules: A Study In Statutory Interpretation, Guyora Binder
Felony Murder And Mens Rea Default Rules: A Study In Statutory Interpretation, Guyora Binder
Journal Articles
The Model Penal Code's influential approach to culpability included default rules assigning a culpable mental state to every conduct, circumstance and result element of each offense. Such rules have been enacted in half of the American states. The Code's drafters also rejected what they understood to be the felony murder rule's imposition of "a form of strict liability for... homicide." Yet almost every state has retained some form of the felony murder rule and so repudiated the Model Penal Code's proposed reform. Because the Model Penal Code's disapproval of felony murder flows from its general disapproval of strict liability, the …
Meaning And Motive In The Law Of Homicide (Reviewing Samuel H. Pillsbury, Judging Evil: Rethinking The Law Of Murder And Manslaughter), Guyora Binder
Meaning And Motive In The Law Of Homicide (Reviewing Samuel H. Pillsbury, Judging Evil: Rethinking The Law Of Murder And Manslaughter), Guyora Binder
Book Reviews
Many criminal law scholars have criticized the Model Penal Code’s restrictive conception of culpability as awareness of risk, and have sought to incorporate motives and desires into culpoability analysis. In his excellent book Judging Evil, Samuel Pillsbury has applied this richer conception of culpability to homicide law. The result is a comprehensive theory of homicide liability, unified by an effort to predicate liability on deficient moral reasoning rather than merely awareness of risk. This review essay explicates and commends Pillsbury’s theory but also criticizes one crucial deficiency. Pillsbury shrinks from one of the most obvious but potentially most controversial implications …
Framed: Utilitarianism And Punishment Of The Innocent, Guyora Binder, Nicholas J. Smith
Framed: Utilitarianism And Punishment Of The Innocent, Guyora Binder, Nicholas J. Smith
Journal Articles
This paper is a defense of utilitarian penology, against the familiar retributivist charge that it promotes framing the innocent, and other charges similarly depending on the notion that utilitarianism encourages officials to deceive the public. Our defense proceeds from the striking fact that utilitarianism's critics do not cite textual evidence that the originators of utilitarian penology in fact endorsed punishing the innocent or deceiving the public. Instead, critics claim that these unsavory policies follow logically from the premises of utilitarianism. Our argument, in brief, is that the charge of framing the innocent rests on a misunderstanding of utilitarian penology. We …
Sex & Surveillance: Gender, Privacy & The Sexualization Of Power In Prison, Teresa A. Miller
Sex & Surveillance: Gender, Privacy & The Sexualization Of Power In Prison, Teresa A. Miller
Journal Articles
In prison, surveillance is power and power is sexualized. Sex and surveillance, therefore, are profoundly linked. Whereas numerous penal scholars from Bentham to Foucault have theorized the force inherent in the visual monitoring of prisoners, the sexualization of power and the relationship between sex and surveillance is more academically obscure. This article criticizes the failure of federal courts to consider the strong and complex relationship between sex and surveillance in analyzing the constitutionality of prison searches, specifically, cross-gender searches.
The analysis proceeds in four parts. Part One introduces the issues posed by sex and surveillance. Part Two describes the sexually …