Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Abolition (1)
- Bail (1)
- Canada (1)
- Criminal courts (1)
- Domestic Implementation of Transnational Criminal Law (1)
-
- Feminism (1)
- Inter-State Cooperation (1)
- International Human Rights Law (1)
- Jurisdiction (1)
- Law of Evidence (1)
- Maternal health (1)
- Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters (1)
- Nursery (1)
- Principle of Nonintervention (1)
- Prison (1)
- Qualitative (1)
- Rough sex defence (1)
- Sadomasochism (1)
- Sexual Assault (1)
- Sexual assault (1)
- Sexual assault doctrine (1)
- Sovereignty (1)
- Transnational Criminal Law (1)
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Law
Advocates’ Perspectives On The Canadian Prison Mother Child Program, Martha Paynter, Clare Heggie, Ruth Martin-Misener, Adelina Iftene, Gail Tomblin Murphy
Advocates’ Perspectives On The Canadian Prison Mother Child Program, Martha Paynter, Clare Heggie, Ruth Martin-Misener, Adelina Iftene, Gail Tomblin Murphy
Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press
Over twenty years ago, Correctional Services Canada launched the Mother Child Program (MCP) to mitigate harms of separating incarcerated mothers from their babies. It has never been subjected to internal evaluation or independent study. The aim of the qualitative study was to explore the experiences of advocates employed by Elizabeth Fry Societies (EFS), community organizations dedicated to the support of incarcerated women, with respect to supporting people who were pregnant or had young children while federally incarcerated and did or did not participate in the MCP.
Admissibility Of Hearsay Gathered Under Mlat: A Tempest In Canada, Robert Currie
Admissibility Of Hearsay Gathered Under Mlat: A Tempest In Canada, Robert Currie
Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press
One of the most pervasive and longstanding problems in the practice of mutual legal assistance in criminal matters between states has been ‘form of evidence’–specifically, can the requested state provide evidence in such form as will be useful and admissible under the criminal evidence laws of the requesting state?It tends to be common law states that have difficulties with admissibility of MLAT-sourced evidence, and these often develop ‘work-arounds’ in their laws which attempt to relax admissibility standards. Canada is one such state, but a series of recent prosecutions has revealed judicial resistance to the tools employed. This note examines these …
Editors' Note, Robert Currie, Neil Boister, Masha Fedorova, Sabine Gless, Cecily Rose, Sara Wharton
Editors' Note, Robert Currie, Neil Boister, Masha Fedorova, Sabine Gless, Cecily Rose, Sara Wharton
Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press
No abstract provided.
State Responsibility For International Bail-Jumping, Robert Currie, Elizabeth Matheson
State Responsibility For International Bail-Jumping, Robert Currie, Elizabeth Matheson
Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press
Over the last decade, there has been a spate of incidents in Canada and the United States involving Saudi Arabian nationals who, while out on bail for predominantly sexual crimes, were able to abscond from the countries despite having surrendered their passports. Investigation has revealed evidence supporting a reasonable inference that the government of Saudi Arabia has, in fact, assisted its nationals to escape on these occasions. This article makes the case that this kind of conduct amounts not just to unfriendly acts but also to infringements upon the territorial sovereignty of both states and serious breaches of the international …
The Legal Regulation Of Sadomasochism And The So-Called “Rough Sex Defence”, Elaine Craig
The Legal Regulation Of Sadomasochism And The So-Called “Rough Sex Defence”, Elaine Craig
Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press
The focus of this article is on the judicial application of Canada’s sexual assault doctrine in the context of the so called ‘rough sex defence’. Canadian criminal courts have seen an increased prevalence of legal narratives about S/M in recent years. In particular, courts are increasingly confronted with individuals who defend themselves against allegations of sexual assault by claiming that the impugned acts constituted consensual S/M or ‘rough sex’. The analysis is aimed at illustrating the way in which courts may fail to properly apply legal doctrine because of a problematic approach to the S/M context in which allegations arose. …