Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Criminal Law

Golden Gate University School of Law

Keyword
Publication Year
Publication
Publication Type

Articles 511 - 516 of 516

Full-Text Articles in Law

People V. Nye [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter Nov 1951

People V. Nye [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter

Jesse Carter Opinions

Evidence of a defendant's prior attempted rape was admissible in his trial for assault with intent to rape a second victim as the evidence of the first offense showed defendant's intent when he entered the second victim's hotel room.


In Re Davis [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter Nov 1951

In Re Davis [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter

Jesse Carter Opinions

A habeas corpus petitioner's claim that his imprisonment was illegal due to the fact that he was not afforded a hearing or notice upon the revocation of his probation was denied. Petitioner failed to show that the revocation was arbitrary.


In Re Mcinturff [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter Oct 1951

In Re Mcinturff [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter

Jesse Carter Opinions

Court reversed a lower court's order granting petitioner a writ of habeas corpus because the writ of habeas corpus was not available to review the trial court's erroneous refusal to certify petitioner to the Youth Authority.


People V. Cullen [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter Jul 1951

People V. Cullen [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter

Jesse Carter Opinions

Defendant's conviction on two counts of murder was proper, even though the victims' bodies were not found. The elements of the corpus delecti were proved circumstantially or inferentially.


In Re Kimler [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter Jul 1951

In Re Kimler [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter

Jesse Carter Opinions

Writ of habeas corpus from Missouri court finding that inmate's extradition to California was not warranted did not preclude the subsequent imprisonment of the inmate in California. The determination was not a pardon.


People V. Thomas, Jesse W. Carter May 1951

People V. Thomas, Jesse W. Carter

Jesse Carter Opinions

In murder case, the court did not have the authority to reduce defendant's death sentence to life imprisonment because defendant failed to show prejudicial error with respect to the sentencing order.