Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Criminal Law and Procedure (16)
- Constitutional Law (15)
- Criminal Law (14)
- Criminal law (9)
- Evidence (6)
-
- Energy Law (5)
- Environmental Law (5)
- Articles (4)
- Capital Punishment (4)
- Civil Rights (4)
- Courts (4)
- Death penalty (4)
- Eighth Amendment (4)
- International Law (4)
- LAW AND SOCIETY (4)
- Child abuse (3)
- Child witnesses (3)
- Constitutional law (3)
- Crime (3)
- Criminal defense (3)
- Death Penalty (3)
- Human Rights Law (3)
- Interrogation (3)
- Judges (3)
- Law (3)
- Law and Economics (3)
- Law and Society (3)
- Originalism (3)
- Rhode Island (3)
- Second Amendment (3)
- Publication
-
- Mubashshir Sarshar (9)
- Beau James Brock (7)
- Richard C. Boldt (6)
- Allison D Redlich (4)
- Donna M. Hughes (4)
-
- Fiona David (4)
- Hari Priya (3)
- Michael Diathesopoulos (3)
- Susana L. SáCouto (3)
- Thomas D. Lyon (3)
- David B Kopel (2)
- David C. Gray (2)
- David Field (2)
- Gideon M. Hart (2)
- Jules Epstein (2)
- Matthew Jordan Cochran (2)
- Oren Gazal-Ayal (2)
- Richard Adelstein (2)
- Samuel J. Levine (2)
- Stuart Green (2)
- Tamar R Birckhead (2)
- William W Berry III (2)
- Alan E Garfield (1)
- Aldo Zammit Borda (1)
- Alex Steel (1)
- Alexa Koenig (1)
- Amelia J Uelmen (1)
- Angela P Harris (1)
- C. Peter Erlinder (1)
- Caroline A Forell (1)
Articles 121 - 122 of 122
Full-Text Articles in Law
“Intelligence” Searches And Purpose: A Significant Mismatch Between Constitutional Criminal Procedure And The Law Of Intelligence-Gathering, Robert C. Power
“Intelligence” Searches And Purpose: A Significant Mismatch Between Constitutional Criminal Procedure And The Law Of Intelligence-Gathering, Robert C. Power
Robert C. Power
No abstract provided.
Determination Of Starting Sentences In Israel—System And Application, Oren Gazal-Ayal, Ruth Kannai
Determination Of Starting Sentences In Israel—System And Application, Oren Gazal-Ayal, Ruth Kannai
Oren Gazal-Ayal
The Israeli Penal Law Bill (Amendment No. 92, Structuring Judicial Discretion in Sentencing) 5766-2006 proposes that a committee be set up to establish sentences that will serve as starting points for judges in their sentencing deliberation (starting sentences). The Israeli Minister of Justice asked the authors to propose starting sentences for three prevalent serious offences in order to show the Knesset (the Israeli parliament) the methodology of determining such starting sentences and to help facilitate the debate about the consequences of these new guidelines. The ministers intended the Knesset to legislate these proposed starting sentences in the appendix to the …