Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Criminal law (3)
- Arkansas (2)
- Habeas corpus (2)
- 18 U.S.C. 3731 (1)
- 18 U.S.C. 3742(b) (1)
-
- 18 USC 201 (1)
- 28 U.S.C. 1291 (1)
- ACCA (1)
- AGFC (1)
- AUSA (1)
- Act 472 (1)
- Admissibility (1)
- Admission of evidence (1)
- Appeal (1)
- Appellate review (1)
- Area enforcement (1)
- Arkansas Game and Fish Commission (1)
- Arkansas Supreme Court (1)
- Arkansas law (1)
- Armed Career Criminal Act (1)
- Assistant United States Attorney (1)
- Balance (1)
- Bribery (1)
- CSA (1)
- Certainty (1)
- Checkpoints (1)
- Cleveland v. Frazier (1)
- Cognizable claim (1)
- Confrontation clause (1)
- Consitution (1)
Articles 1 - 8 of 8
Full-Text Articles in Law
When An Appeal Goes Wrong: A “Criminal Justice Nightmare”, David R. Dow, Jeffrey R. Newberry
When An Appeal Goes Wrong: A “Criminal Justice Nightmare”, David R. Dow, Jeffrey R. Newberry
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
When The United States Loses In A Criminal Case: The Government Appeal Process, Margaret D. Mcgaughey
When The United States Loses In A Criminal Case: The Government Appeal Process, Margaret D. Mcgaughey
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
Criminal Law—When The Pillow Talks: Arkansas's Rape Shield Statute Bars Dna Evidence Excluding The Defendant As The Source Of Semen. Thacker V. State, 2015 Ark. 406, 474 S.W.3d 65., Lacon Marie Smith
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Juror Assessment Of Certainty About Firearms Identification Evidence, Sarah L. Cooper, Paraic Scanlon
Juror Assessment Of Certainty About Firearms Identification Evidence, Sarah L. Cooper, Paraic Scanlon
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Criminal Law—A Formal Exercise Of Governmental Corruption: Applying The “Stream Of Benefits” Theory To The Federal Bribery Statute. Mcdonnell V. United States, 136 S. Ct. 2355 (2016)., Taylor Williams
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Criminal Law—When Apples Tatse Like Oranges, You Cannot Judge A Book By Its Cover: How To Fight Emerging Synthetic "Designer" Drugs Of Abuse, Andrew Payne Norwood
Criminal Law—When Apples Tatse Like Oranges, You Cannot Judge A Book By Its Cover: How To Fight Emerging Synthetic "Designer" Drugs Of Abuse, Andrew Payne Norwood
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Not Fit To Be Tried: Due Process And Mentally-Incompetent Criminal Defendants, J. Thomas Sullivan
Not Fit To Be Tried: Due Process And Mentally-Incompetent Criminal Defendants, J. Thomas Sullivan
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
A mentally-impaired accused who cannot comprehend the nature of the proceedings or assist his counsel in presenting his defense to the criminal charge cannot be tried as a matter of due process of law. In Jackson v. Indiana, 1 the United States Supreme Court held that due process concerns also bar the never-ending jeopardy resulting from an inability to restore an impaired accused to competence for purposes of proceeding to trial. When an Arkansas circuit court ordered the dismissal of pending criminal charges against an impaired accused who could not be restored to fitness for trial, the Arkansas Supreme Court, …
Constitutional Law—Fourth Amendment Search And Seizure—We've Got Ourselves In A Pickle: The Supreme Court Of Arkansas's Recent Expansion Of Fourht Amendment Rights May Have Unintended Consequences. Pickle V. State, 2015 Ark. 286, 466 S.W. 3d 410, Ben Honaker
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.