Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- U.S. Supreme Court (2)
- 2000 Presidential Election (1)
- Adverse Expert Witness (1)
- Amicus briefs (1)
- Article I (1)
-
- Capital punishment -- United States (1)
- Community-Notification Laws (1)
- Court of Justice (1)
- Criminal procedure (1)
- DNA Evidence (1)
- Death Penalty Cases (1)
- Equitable power (1)
- Equity (1)
- Ethical Restraints (1)
- European Union (1)
- Ex Parte Communication (1)
- Expert (1)
- Expert evidence (1)
- Federal Circuit courts (1)
- Fourth Amendment Law (1)
- Gerrymandering (1)
- Indiana (1)
- Indiana State Courts (1)
- Interest group litigation (1)
- Involuntary Committed Mental Patients (1)
- Judges (1)
- Judicial accountability (1)
- Judicial elections (1)
- Judicial independence (1)
- Judicial statistics (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 11 of 11
Full-Text Articles in Law
"Be Careful What You Ask For": The 2000 Presidential Election, The U.S. Supreme Court, And The Law Of Criminal Procedure, Craig M. Bradley, Joseph L. Hoffmann
"Be Careful What You Ask For": The 2000 Presidential Election, The U.S. Supreme Court, And The Law Of Criminal Procedure, Craig M. Bradley, Joseph L. Hoffmann
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Violence And The Truth, Joseph L. Hoffmann
Violence And The Truth, Joseph L. Hoffmann
Indiana Law Journal
Harry Pratter Professorship Lecture, Indiana University School of Law, Bloomington, Indiana
Protecting Our Mentally Ill: A Critique Of The Role Of Indiana State Courts In Protecting Involuntarily Committed Mental Patients' Right To Refuse Medication, Michael Leonard Goff Jr.
Protecting Our Mentally Ill: A Critique Of The Role Of Indiana State Courts In Protecting Involuntarily Committed Mental Patients' Right To Refuse Medication, Michael Leonard Goff Jr.
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Can We Talk?: Removing Counterproductive Ethical Restraints Upon Ex Parte Communication Between Attorneys And Adverse Expert Witnesses, Stephen D. Easton
Can We Talk?: Removing Counterproductive Ethical Restraints Upon Ex Parte Communication Between Attorneys And Adverse Expert Witnesses, Stephen D. Easton
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Making The Case For Megan's Law: A Study In Legislative Rhetoric, Daniel M. Filler
Making The Case For Megan's Law: A Study In Legislative Rhetoric, Daniel M. Filler
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
The Jurisdiction Of The Community Courts Reconsidered, Paul Craig
The Jurisdiction Of The Community Courts Reconsidered, Paul Craig
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
Challenges To Racial Redistricting In The New Millennium: Hunt V. Cromartie As A Case Study, Luis Fuentes-Rohwer, Guy-Uriel E. Charles
Challenges To Racial Redistricting In The New Millennium: Hunt V. Cromartie As A Case Study, Luis Fuentes-Rohwer, Guy-Uriel E. Charles
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
Public Interest Litigation In A Comparative Context, Jayanth K. Krishnan
Public Interest Litigation In A Comparative Context, Jayanth K. Krishnan
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
Patent Law In The Age Of The Invisible Supreme Court, Mark D. Janis
Patent Law In The Age Of The Invisible Supreme Court, Mark D. Janis
Articles by Maurer Faculty
This article examines the permanence of the U.S. Supreme Court's retreat to the peripheries of patent law after the creation of the Federal Circuit, and explores the roles that the Supreme Court might imagine for itself in contemporary patent law. For discussion purposes, the article describes two hypothetical models for Supreme Court decisionmaking in patent cases: an aggressive interventionist model and an extreme non-interventionist model. After considering the shortcomings of both models, the article proposes an intermediate, managerial model. The managerial model rejects the proposition that the Court should intervene in patent cases to correct perceived substantive errors in Federal …
Equity And The Article I Court: Is The Tax Court's Exercise Of Equitable Powers Constitutional?, Leandra Lederman
Equity And The Article I Court: Is The Tax Court's Exercise Of Equitable Powers Constitutional?, Leandra Lederman
Articles by Maurer Faculty
Article I courts are the other federal courts, infrequently studied despite their important role in the judiciary. This article focuses on the United States Tax Court, an Article I court that hears approximately 95 percent of litigated federal tax cases. The article argues that the Tax Court's current tendency to apply equitable doctrines when necessary to avoid harsh outcomes dictated by statute lacks constitutional authority. First, the article examines the role of Article I courts in the federal judicial system and under the Constitution. Next, it considers the historical and modern meanings of equity and equitable powers in the context …
Publicly Financed Judicial Elections: An Overview, Charles G. Geyh
Publicly Financed Judicial Elections: An Overview, Charles G. Geyh
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.