Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Federal Courts (4)
- Common law (2)
- Medieval courts (2)
- Assize of novel disseisin (1)
- California Supreme Court (1)
-
- Civil Procedure (1)
- Civil Rights (1)
- Collateral attack (1)
- Competition (1)
- Congress and lower federal courts (1)
- Constitutional Law (1)
- Constitutional Law; Federal Courts; Civil Procedure; Social Security (1)
- Constitutional Law; Federal Courts; Criminal Law; Criminal Procedure (1)
- Constitutional Law; Federal Courts; Family Law; Evidence; (1)
- Conveyor's Corp. of America v. Industrial Commission (1)
- Courts of appeal (1)
- Courts-martial (1)
- Criminal Law (1)
- Damages (1)
- Direct attack (1)
- Donald W. Sutherland (1)
- Employee (1)
- English plea tolls (1)
- Evidence (1)
- Executive power (1)
- Executive privilege (Government information) (1)
- Federal Rules of Evidence (1)
- Federal appellate courts (1)
- Federal court jurisdiction (1)
- Federal courts (1)
- Publication
Articles 1 - 30 of 32
Full-Text Articles in Law
Donald Clyde Riley V. Commonwealth Of Kentucky, Appellee's Brief 1974-Sc-0881
Donald Clyde Riley V. Commonwealth Of Kentucky, Appellee's Brief 1974-Sc-0881
1970-1979
No abstract provided.
Donald Clyde Riley V. Commonwealth Of Kentucky, Appellant's Brief 1974-Sc-0881
Donald Clyde Riley V. Commonwealth Of Kentucky, Appellant's Brief 1974-Sc-0881
1970-1979
No abstract provided.
Delmer Lee Ware V. Commonwealth Of Kentucky, Appellee's Brief 1974-Sc-0748
Delmer Lee Ware V. Commonwealth Of Kentucky, Appellee's Brief 1974-Sc-0748
1970-1979
No abstract provided.
O'Connor V. Donaldson, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
O'Connor V. Donaldson, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Stanton V. Stanton, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Stanton V. Stanton, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Weinberger V. Wiesenfeld, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Weinberger V. Wiesenfeld, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Oregon V. Hass, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
United States V. Nixon, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
United States V. Nixon, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
White V. Regester, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Securities Investor Protection Corporation V. Barbour, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Securities Investor Protection Corporation V. Barbour, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Albemarle Paper Co. V. Moody, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Albemarle Paper Co. V. Moody, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
W. Thomas Mcelhinney V. Board Of Governors For Wm. Booth Memorial Hospital, A Division Of The Salvation Army And Major Glenn Siler, Individually And As Administrator And Executive Agent For Wm. Booth Memorial Hospital, Appellee's Brief 1974-Sc-0817
W. Thomas Mcelhinney V. Board Of Governors For Wm. Booth Memorial Hospital, A Division Of The Salvation Army And Major Glenn Siler, Individually And As Administrator And Executive Agent For Wm. Booth Memorial Hospital, Appellee's Brief 1974-Sc-0817
1970-1979
No abstract provided.
Delmer Lee Ware V. Commonwealth Of Kentucky, Appellant's Brief 1974-Sc-0748
Delmer Lee Ware V. Commonwealth Of Kentucky, Appellant's Brief 1974-Sc-0748
1970-1979
No abstract provided.
W. Thomas Mcelhinney V. Board Of Governors For Wm. Booth Memorial Hospital, A Division Of The Salvation Army And Major Glenn Siler, Individually And As Administrator And Executive Agent For Wm. Booth Memorial Hospital, Appellant's Brief 1974-Sc-0817
W. Thomas Mcelhinney V. Board Of Governors For Wm. Booth Memorial Hospital, A Division Of The Salvation Army And Major Glenn Siler, Individually And As Administrator And Executive Agent For Wm. Booth Memorial Hospital, Appellant's Brief 1974-Sc-0817
1970-1979
No abstract provided.
United Mine Workers Of America, A Labor Organization, Though Hugh Jones, Joseph E. Phipps, Ronald Curtis, Mitchell Messer, Jerry Wynn, Ray Widner, As Representative Of A Class And The United Mine Workers Of America, A Labor Organization, Defendants In The Lower Court V. Eastover Mining Company., Reply Brief 1974-Sc-0120
1970-1979
No abstract provided.
United Mine Workers Of America, A Labor Organization, Though Hugh Jones, Joseph E. Phipps, Ronald Curtis, Mitchell Messer, Jerry Wynn, Ray Widner, As Representative Of A Class And The United Mine Workers Of America, A Labor Organization, Defendants In The Lower Court V. Eastover Mining Company., Appellee's Brief 1974-Sc-0120
1970-1979
No abstract provided.
Judicial Notice: An Exercise In Exorcism, E. F. Roberts
Judicial Notice: An Exercise In Exorcism, E. F. Roberts
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Federal Appellate Justice In 1973, Roger C. Cramton
Federal Appellate Justice In 1973, Roger C. Cramton
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
United Mine Workers Of America, A Labor Organization, Though Hugh Jones, Joseph E. Phipps, Ronald Curtis, Mitchell Messer, Jerry Wynn, Ray Widner, As Representative Of A Class And The United Mine Workers Of America, A Labor Organization, Defendants In The Lower Court V. Eastover Mining Company., Appellant's Brief 1974-Sc-0120
1970-1979
No abstract provided.
The Grand Jury--Prosecutorial Abuse Of The Indictment Process, 65 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 157 (1974), Robert G. Johnston
The Grand Jury--Prosecutorial Abuse Of The Indictment Process, 65 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 157 (1974), Robert G. Johnston
UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Workmen's Compensation Benefits Recoverable On The Existence Of A Quasi Contract, David Frisch
Workmen's Compensation Benefits Recoverable On The Existence Of A Quasi Contract, David Frisch
Law Faculty Publications
An analysis on a worker's compensation case decided by the Supreme Court of Florida.
A Political And Constitutional Review Of United States V. Nixon, William W. Van Alstyne
A Political And Constitutional Review Of United States V. Nixon, William W. Van Alstyne
Faculty Scholarship
This comparison of United States v. Nixon and the Pentagon Papers case finds the greatest similarity and significance shared by the two cases was the anti-climactic nature of their conclusions. While both cases concerned constitutional questions of the highest order, centered around the scope of the executive power, both cases were drawn on such narrow grounds that there was hardly any effect on constitutional law doctrine.
Prior Inconsistent Statements: Presently Inconsistent Doctrine, Mark Reutlinger
Prior Inconsistent Statements: Presently Inconsistent Doctrine, Mark Reutlinger
Faculty Articles
The common law has come a long way since Sir Walter Raleigh was convicted of treason on the basis of accusations contained in unproduced letters and the hearsay declarations of unproduced witnesses. However, despite the painstaking development and innumerable formulations and reformulations of the hearsay rule over the past several centuries, there are areas of that body of law which are as yet unsettled and the subject of heated controversy. One such area is that of prior inconsistent statements of witnesses, the controversy over which has continued over the years and has surfaced once again with promulgation of the new …
Book Review. The Assize Of Novel Disseisin By Donald W. Sutherland, Morris S. Arnold
Book Review. The Assize Of Novel Disseisin By Donald W. Sutherland, Morris S. Arnold
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
Congressional Authority To Restrict Lower Federal Court Jurisdiction, Theodore Eisenberg
Congressional Authority To Restrict Lower Federal Court Jurisdiction, Theodore Eisenberg
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
Separation of powers in the federal government inevitably generates conflicts among the branches. In recent years the executive branch's authority to impound funds appropriated by Congress and to make war without congressional approval has been questioned. In earlier days debate raged over the Supreme Court's authority to nullify legislation passed by Congress. A recurrent example of this phenomenon has been the struggle between Congress and the judiciary over the scope of congressional control of federal court jurisdiction. The recent controversy over school busing has highlighted this problem. The problem is, however, neither novel nor peculiar to the busing issue. In …
Law And Fact In The Medieval Jury Trial: Out Of Sight, Out Of Mind, Morris S. Arnold
Law And Fact In The Medieval Jury Trial: Out Of Sight, Out Of Mind, Morris S. Arnold
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
Attempts And Monopolization: A Mildly Expansionary Answer To The Prophylactic Riddle Of Section Two, Edward H. Cooper
Attempts And Monopolization: A Mildly Expansionary Answer To The Prophylactic Riddle Of Section Two, Edward H. Cooper
Articles
The efforts of activist antitrust lawyers to redefine the contours of attempted monopolization under section 2 of the Sherman Act1 have again forced the courts to wrestle with the classic antitrust dilemma: How far must single-firm competitive behavior be restrained to make competition free? The answer given by the majority of current decisions is that, absent some other established offense, single-firm behavior should be prohibited as an attempt to monopolize only when there is a specific intent to monopolize and the firm has come dangerously near to unlawful monopolization. A contemporary challenge to this orthodox answer is rapidly gaining force. …
A Proposal For Limiting The Duty Of The Trial Judge To Instruct The Jury Sua Sponte, Paul H. Robinson
A Proposal For Limiting The Duty Of The Trial Judge To Instruct The Jury Sua Sponte, Paul H. Robinson
All Faculty Scholarship
This Article will present what appears to be a workable system which allows fulfillment of both of the jury instruction functions-jury guidance and legal-theory-resolution-and which will simultaneously reduce the number of reversals due to judicial error in instructing the jury (the latter result may be anticipated in any system which is able to produce the former result). This Article proposes the abolition of the sua sponte duty of the trial judge except for certain basic instructions to be specified by statute or by rule of court. The proposal would retain for each advocate the opportunity to propose instructions reflecting his …
Proposal And Analysis Of A Unitary System For Review Of Criminal Judgments, Paul H. Robinson
Proposal And Analysis Of A Unitary System For Review Of Criminal Judgments, Paul H. Robinson
All Faculty Scholarship
Debate continues over expanded use of habeus corpus for collateral attack of criminal judgments. Some commentators argue that the current system of seemingly endless post-conviction review fails to provide the finality and integrity required of any truly fair and effective system of criminal justice. Others claim that such an expansive post-conviction remedy system is justified when a man's liberty is at stake. It is a central thesis of this article that not only does the present system of post-conviction remedies fall short of achieving adequate fairness and comprehensiveness, but also that the attempt to achieve these values has produced a …
Abortion: The Court Decides A Non-Case, Joseph O'Meara
Abortion: The Court Decides A Non-Case, Joseph O'Meara
Journal Articles
It took the Supreme Court 105 years to discover that the Fourteenth Amendment guarantees a personal right of privacy that invalidates state statutes forbidding abortion except to save the mother's life. As Mr. Justice Rehnquist pointed out, in a dissent that no member of the Court attempted to answer, at least thirty-six states had such anti-abortion statutes when the Fourteenth Amendment was adopted. None was attacked on the ground that they offended the newly adopted amendment. The only conclusion possible from this history is that the drafters did not intend to have the Fourteenth Amendment withdraw from the States the …