Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
Articles 1 - 9 of 9
Full-Text Articles in Law
Penerapan Sanksi Daftar Hitam Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah Dalam Perspektif Penegakan Hukum Persaingan Usaha, Gleshya Regita Putri My Made
Penerapan Sanksi Daftar Hitam Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah Dalam Perspektif Penegakan Hukum Persaingan Usaha, Gleshya Regita Putri My Made
"Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI
The authority to impose blacklisting sanction, particularly in terms of the procurement of government goods/services stipulated in Presidential Regulation 16/2018 and LKPP Regulation 17/2018 may only be exercised by the Budget User (Pengguna Anggaran/”PA”)/Authorized Budget (Kuasa Pengguna Anggaran/”KPA”). Neither the said regulations do also clearly state that the Business Competition Supervisory Commission (Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha/”KPPU”) has the authority to impose such blacklisting sanction in relation to the procurement of government goods/services. This research examines the authority of KPPU in imposing blacklisting sanction against business practitioner who are proven violating business competition law and …
Varying Declarations Of Interdependence: The Tenth Circuit's Inconsistent Analysis Of Criminal Conspiracy, Jeff Van Der Veer
Varying Declarations Of Interdependence: The Tenth Circuit's Inconsistent Analysis Of Criminal Conspiracy, Jeff Van Der Veer
University of Colorado Law Review
The Tenth Circuit distinguishes itself from its sister circuits by requiring the prosecution to prove a unique element in all federal criminal conspiracy cases: interdependence. Taken literally, interdependence exists when each conspirator relies on his fellow conspirators to achieve their collective criminal goal. While the Tenth Circuit may have enforced this literal definition in the past, it has since announced varying definitions that have relaxed the standard, thus creating an imprecise and confusing area of case law. This unfortunate evolution has transformed what was once a unique requirement into little more than a formality. The Tenth Circuit should return to …
Civil Practice And Procedure, John R. Walk
Civil Practice And Procedure, John R. Walk
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Coconspirator Statements And Former Testimony In New York And Federal Courts With Some Comments On Codification, Randolph N. Jonakait
Coconspirator Statements And Former Testimony In New York And Federal Courts With Some Comments On Codification, Randolph N. Jonakait
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Abrams V. United States: Remembering The Authors Of Both Opinions, James F. Fagan Jr.
Abrams V. United States: Remembering The Authors Of Both Opinions, James F. Fagan Jr.
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Conspiracy And Federal Jurisdiction: From Crimmins To Feola, Mark Berger
Conspiracy And Federal Jurisdiction: From Crimmins To Feola, Mark Berger
Villanova Law Review
No abstract provided.
Constitutional Law-Jury Trial-Validity Of The "Blue Ribbon" Jury, Edward S. Tripp S.Ed.
Constitutional Law-Jury Trial-Validity Of The "Blue Ribbon" Jury, Edward S. Tripp S.Ed.
Michigan Law Review
Defendants, labor union officers, were indicted for conspiracy and extortion. The state moved for a "blue ribbon" jury. Defendants objected to the "blue ribbon" panel on grounds of denial of due process and equal protection; first, because laborers and women were unlawfully excluded from the panel, and also because "blue ribbon" juries were more inclined to convict than common juries. Defendants later accepted each individual juror. Defendants were convicted and the New York appellate court affirmed. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari. Held, affirmed. Defendants failed to show any intentional and purposeful exclusion which would be prejudicial to …
Criminal Law And Procedure - Voluntary Communication To Grand Jury As Contempt, James K. Lindsay
Criminal Law And Procedure - Voluntary Communication To Grand Jury As Contempt, James K. Lindsay
Michigan Law Review
Defendant wrote two letters to the grand jury, then in session, asking leave to appear before it to present evidence of a conspiracy, described therein in highly inflammatory language, between a newspaper, the county assessor and the state's attorney to defraud the state of many millions of revenue by the illegal omission of the newspaper's personal property from the county tax rolls. The state's attorney filed an information incorporating these letters. The trial court found that defendant was guilty of criminal contempt. On appeal, defendant contended that this conviction deprived him of his constitutional right of free speech. Held, …