Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- ABA (1)
- Aichner v. Aichner (1)
- Alls v. Alls (1)
- Armstrong v. Armstrong (1)
- Brooker v. Brooker (1)
-
- Capell v. Capell (1)
- Capps v. Capps (1)
- Cooley v. Cooley (1)
- Estin v. Estin (1)
- Graham v. Graham (1)
- Guy v. Guy (1)
- Hooker v. Hooker (1)
- Isaacs v. Isaacs (1)
- Johnson v. Johnson (1)
- Judicial Council (1)
- Kreiger v. Kreiger (1)
- Lindsay v. Lindsay (1)
- McConkey v. McConkey (1)
- McIlwain v. Mcllwain (1)
- Moore v. Moore (1)
- Morris v. Morris (1)
- Newport v. Newport (1)
- Osborne v. Osborne (1)
- Painter v. Painter (1)
- Richardson v. Moore (1)
- Robertson v. Robertson (1)
- Rowland v. Rowland (1)
- Sanderson v. Sanderson (1)
- Shoosmith v. Scott (1)
- State Corporation Commission (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Law
Overview Of Virginia Supreme Court Cases On Domestic Relations: 1970-1980, Peter N. Pross
Overview Of Virginia Supreme Court Cases On Domestic Relations: 1970-1980, Peter N. Pross
University of Richmond Law Review
The Supreme Court of Virginia examined a variety of domestic relations problems and issues during the last decade. Most of the court's decisions involved divorce issues such as jurisdiction, alimony or support and maintenance, and child custody or support orders. However, the court also decided cases on annulment, the enforcement of support and maintenance decrees, legitimacy and paternity, adoption, name changes and intrafamily tort immunity.
The Virginia Judicial Council's Intermediate Appellate Court Proposal, Martha B. Brissette
The Virginia Judicial Council's Intermediate Appellate Court Proposal, Martha B. Brissette
University of Richmond Law Review
The ever-expanding volume of appellate litigation in Virginia has engendered a crisis in appellate justice in this state which can be adequately addressed only by the creation of an intermediate appellate court. Not only is Virginia the most populous state without such an intermediate court, its highest court also has the largest caseload of any single state appellate court.