Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 15 of 15
Full-Text Articles in Law
A Failure To Communicate, Erwin Chemerinsky
The Monster In The Courtroom, Sonja R. West
Supreme Court Oral Argument Video: A Review Of Media Effects Research And Suggestions For Study, Edward L. Carter
Supreme Court Oral Argument Video: A Review Of Media Effects Research And Suggestions For Study, Edward L. Carter
BYU Law Review
No abstract provided.
Cameras At The Supreme Court: A Rhetorical Analysis, Lisa T. Mcelroy
Cameras At The Supreme Court: A Rhetorical Analysis, Lisa T. Mcelroy
BYU Law Review
No abstract provided.
Cameras In The Courtroom In The Twenty-First Century: The U.S. Supreme Court Learning From Abroad?, Kyu Ho Youm
Cameras In The Courtroom In The Twenty-First Century: The U.S. Supreme Court Learning From Abroad?, Kyu Ho Youm
BYU Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Justices And News Judgment: The Supreme Court As News Editor, Amy Gajda
The Justices And News Judgment: The Supreme Court As News Editor, Amy Gajda
BYU Law Review
No abstract provided.
U.S. Supreme Court Justices And Press Access, Ronnell Andersen Jones
U.S. Supreme Court Justices And Press Access, Ronnell Andersen Jones
BYU Law Review
No abstract provided.
Not A Free Press Court?, Lyrissa Barnett Lidsky
Moving Beyond Cameras In The Courtroom: Technology, The Media, And The Supreme Court, Mary-Rose Papandrea
Moving Beyond Cameras In The Courtroom: Technology, The Media, And The Supreme Court, Mary-Rose Papandrea
BYU Law Review
No abstract provided.
Originalism And Loving V. Virginia, Steven G. Calabresi, Andrea Matthews
Originalism And Loving V. Virginia, Steven G. Calabresi, Andrea Matthews
BYU Law Review
No abstract provided.
Repudiating The Narrow Rule In Capital Sentencing, Scott W. Howe
Repudiating The Narrow Rule In Capital Sentencing, Scott W. Howe
BYU Law Review
This Article proposes a modest reform of Eighth Amendment law governing capital sentencing to spur major reform in the understanding of the function of the doctrine. The Article urges the Supreme Court to renounce a largely empty mandate known as the “narrowing” rule and the rhetoric of equality that has accompanied it. By doing so, the Court could speak more truthfully about the important but more limited function that its capital-sentencing doctrine actually pursues, which is to ensure that no person receives the death penalty who does not deserve it. The Court could also speak more candidly than it has …
Implicit Balancing In The Adjudication Of Criminal Law, Aaron Arnson
Implicit Balancing In The Adjudication Of Criminal Law, Aaron Arnson
BYU Law Review
No abstract provided.
Mohamed V. Jeppesen Dataplan, Inc.: The Ninth Circuit Sends The Totten Bar Flying Away On The Jeppesen Airplane, Michael Q. Cannon
Mohamed V. Jeppesen Dataplan, Inc.: The Ninth Circuit Sends The Totten Bar Flying Away On The Jeppesen Airplane, Michael Q. Cannon
BYU Law Review
No abstract provided.
Judicial Takings In Vandevere V. Lloyd, Cory S. Clements
Judicial Takings In Vandevere V. Lloyd, Cory S. Clements
BYU Law Review
No abstract provided.
Marriage, Fundamental Premises, And The California, Connecticut, And Iowa Supreme Courts, Monte Neil Stewart, Jacob D. Briggs, Julie Slater
Marriage, Fundamental Premises, And The California, Connecticut, And Iowa Supreme Courts, Monte Neil Stewart, Jacob D. Briggs, Julie Slater
BYU Law Review
The highest courts in California, Connecticut, and Iowa recently held that the constitutional norm of equality requires the redefinition of marriage from “the union of a man and a woman” to “the union of any two persons.” The argument leading to that holding, like all arguments, proceeds from premises that the argument does not prove but that serve as the starting point for reasoning. Those premises range from the nature of contemporary American marriage to the equivalence of the pre- and post-redefinition marriage institutions, to the social costs, if any, resulting from redefinition, and to marriage’s relationship with other social …