Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- A.C.A 16-55-202 (1)
- A.C.A. 16-55-212(b) (1)
- Act title (1)
- Administrative interpretation (1)
- Amendment 80 (1)
-
- Appellate review of non-jurisdictional matters in abatement (1)
- Arkansas General Assembly (1)
- Arkansas legislature (1)
- Arrest (1)
- Civil Justice Reform Act of 2003 (CJRA) (1)
- Curtis v. State (1)
- Emergency clause (1)
- Executive interpretation (1)
- Federal prosecution (1)
- Federal sentencing (1)
- General rules (1)
- History of statutes (1)
- House journals (1)
- Immigration and Customs Enforcement Act (1)
- Immigration laws (1)
- Judicial law making (1)
- Judiciary Act of 1789 (1)
- Language and outcome (1)
- Legislative history (1)
- Preamble (1)
- Role of appellate courts (1)
- Section 2105 of the Judicial Code (1)
- Senate journals (1)
- State v. Sypult (1)
- Subsequent amendments (1)
Articles 1 - 6 of 6
Full-Text Articles in Law
That Ain't Kosher, Robert Steinbuch, Brett Tolman
That Ain't Kosher, Robert Steinbuch, Brett Tolman
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
State Supreme Court Opinions As Law Development, Victor Eugene Flango
State Supreme Court Opinions As Law Development, Victor Eugene Flango
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
Matters In Abatement, Aaron R. Petty
Matters In Abatement, Aaron R. Petty
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
The Language Of Supreme Court Briefs: A Large-Scale Quantitative Investigation, Brady Coleman, Quy Phung
The Language Of Supreme Court Briefs: A Large-Scale Quantitative Investigation, Brady Coleman, Quy Phung
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
Using Legislative History In Arkansas To Determine Legislative Intent: An Examination Of Cases And Review Of The Sources, Kathryn C. Fitzhugh, Melissa M. Serfass
Using Legislative History In Arkansas To Determine Legislative Intent: An Examination Of Cases And Review Of The Sources, Kathryn C. Fitzhugh, Melissa M. Serfass
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
This article summarizes the legislative process in Arkansas. It lists and provides descriptions of Arkansas's primary sources of legislation, including print and online resources. An examination of case law focuses on this question: what do Arkansas appellate courts mean when they say they consider legislative history in determining the intent of the legislature; specifically, what types of information will the courts consider? A brief discussion of several general rules of statutory construction in Arkansas precedes an examination of specific sources the courts have relied on. These sources include House and Senate Journals, act titles, preambles, emergency clauses, official commentary, executive …
A Twilight Zone No More: The Arkansas Supreme Court Provides Tort Reform Drafting Tips While Distancing Itself From Deference To The General Assembly In Johnson V. Rockwell Automation, Inc., Jodie L. Hill
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.